HC Deb 19 April 1911 vol 24 cc855-7
Mr. CHIOZZA MONEY

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if his attention has been directed to the statement made in debate in the Turkish Parliament on Saturday, 8th April, that the Turkish Government is obtaining from Messrs. Armstrong two "Dreadnoughts" without armament for £51 per ton, as against £63 per ton paid by the British Government for precisely the same type of ship; and if he will explain why this country should pay more than Turkey for such ships?

Dr. MACNAMARA

I must refer my hon. Friend to a reply I gave on 12th April to a starred question put by my hon. Friend the Member for Bedford, and to a reply I gave to an unstarred question put by the hon. Gentleman the Member for Hammersmith on 18th April.

Mr. CHIOZZA MONEY

Did the hon. Gentleman inquire from Messrs. Armstrong's, as they are specifically mentioned?

Dr. MACNAMARA

No.

Mr. CHIOZZA MONEY

Will he do so?

Dr. MACNAMARA

No, I cannot do so on the facts stated.

Mr. ASHLEY

asked what was the displacement of the first battleships of the "Dreadnought" type to be built within a contract period of two years; and what is the tonnage, actual or estimated, of the latest ships which are to be built within this period?

Dr. MACNAMARA

The first contract-built battleship of the "Dreadnought" type to be built under a contract period of two years was the "Superb," delivered on 24th May, 1909, with a displacement tonnage of 18,600 tons. The next contract-built ship coming within this category was the "Vanguard," delivered on 28th February, 1910, with a displacement tonnage of 19,250 tons. The displacement tonnage for the latest "Dreadnought" ships now building has not yet been published.

Mr. KELLAWAY

asked (1) the cost per ton of hull, armour for hull, and machinery, of the latest Admiralty "Dreadnought" delivered from contractors? And (2) if he will state, as nearly as his information allows, what is the cost per ton of the hull and machinery of "Dreadnoughts" built in Government yards and of "Dreadnoughts" built in private yards in this country?

Dr. MACNAMARA

I can only repeat the general answer I gave to my hon. Friend on 12th April respecting the average cost per ton of "Dreadnoughts," adding that, after full consideration, I am of opinion that it would not be desirable to furnish the detailed information asked for in the present question, as such information would tend to disclose the actual weights of armour and hull respectively in our latest ships.

Mr. KELLAWAY

Is not the information practically public as to how much is paid for ships' tonnage and armour?

Dr. MACNAMARA

No. We do give in the Estimates the aggregate cost of the armour and the hull and the aggregate weight of the armour and the hull, but if we gave the cost per ton of the armour and hull separately it would be possible by a simple mathmatical calculation to arrive at particulars with regard to the weight of the armour of the ships, which is not given.

Mr. KELLAWAY

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if he will state, as nearly as he is able, the cost per ton of the total displacement of Government dockyard-built "Dreadnoughts" on the one hand, and contractor-built "Dreadnoughts" on the other?

Dr. MACNAMARA

For the "Dreadnoughts" already completed the following are the particulars asked:—

Tonnage. Average cost per ton of total displacement.
Dockyard-built:— £
"Dreadnought" 17,900 99.8
"Bellerophon" 18,600 94.8
"Temeraire" 18,600 93.7
"St. Vincent" 19,250 89.4
"Collingwood" 19,250 87.1
Contract-built:—
"Superb" 18,600 89.2
"Vanguard" 19,250 83.4

I have already advised my hon. Friend that any comparison instituted between the cost of dockyard-built ships on the one hand, and contract-built ships on the other, is subject to the reservation that the bases of cost are not precisely identical. This comment particularly applies to the items included under the heading of indirect charges.

Mr. KELLAWAY

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that those figures for the contract-built ships work out at about £7 per ton more than Turkey is paying, according to the figures given in the Turkish Parliament?

Dr. MACNAMARA

I rather fancy my hon. Friend is referring to a statement as to the hull and machinery. I am referring to the total displacement.

Mr. KELLAWAY

Will the hon. Gentleman refer again to the report of the proceedings in the Turkish Parliament? He will there find figures for the total displacement, and those figures are considerably lower than we are paying in this country.