HC Deb 16 June 1910 vol 17 cc1458-9
Mr. FALLE

asked if Admiralty Circular Letter No. 16, of 7th April, 1910, defining command and military command, is intended to be read with Circular Letter No. 4157 of 28th March, 1903, or if its effect is to prevent and avoid the fusion of the present engineer and military branches?

Mr. McKENNA

The circular letter of 7th April was issued without reference to the circular letter of 28th March, 1903, and was intended simply to define more clearly the responsibility of officers of the different branches in their own departments.

Mr. WEDGWOOD

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the circular letter of 7th April has caused intense dissatisfaction in the engineering branches of the Navy, and that they read it as meaning that the new engineer officers under the scheme will be in advance when the fusion takes place next year?

Mr. McKENNA

The reply I have just given should be quite sufficient to relieve them from that apprehension.

Mr. WEDGWOOD

Will there be any chance of discussing the question this year in the House on the Votes?

Mr. McKENNA

I am afraid that is not a matter within my power. I do not control the business of the House.

Mr. WEDGWOOD

Will the Navy Vote for the men not come on again?

Mr. McKENNA

No. Vote A for the men is finished.