HC Deb 21 July 1910 vol 19 cc1452-3
Sir CLEMENT KINLOCH-COOKE

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether any Order was issued by the Admiralty similar to that issued by the War Office on 23rd May last, granting certain acts of pardon on the occasion of His Majesty's Accession; whether such Order included deserters, and, if not, will he explain to the House the reason for their non-inclusion?

Dr. MACNAMARA

Orders were issued under which men who, on 23rd May, were under sentence of imprisonment for disciplinary offences—including, I may add, desertion—were granted the remission of the residue of their sentences. A similar remission was granted to offenders undergoing certain minor punishments under Article 744 of the King's Regulations. The terms of the Order were most carefully considered before it was issued, and I cannot undertake to recommend any further act of clemency.

Sir C. KINLOCH-COOKE

In regard to this act of clemency, was there one Regulation for the Army and another for the Navy?

Dr. MACNAMARA

I have stated that the men who were undergoing imprisonment for desertion had the residue of their sentences remitted. Beyond that I cannot undertake to recommend any special clemency.

Sir C. KINLOCH-COOKE

Then the question of pardon is not to be considered?

Dr. MACNAMARA

Not beyond the terms of my answer.