§ Mr. WHELERasked the Chancellor whether he proposes to remit the 30 per cent. Licence Duty imposed under the Finance (1909–10) Act, 1910, on licensed houses valued at over £50 in Dublin; and, if so, whether he proposes to grant a remission to licensed houses of similar value in Great Britain?
§ Mr. LLOYD GEORGEI understand the question should read 20 per cent. instead of 30 per cent. in the second line. I do not know what particular charge of Licence Duty is meant by the "20 per cent. Licence Duty" mentioned in this question, but I may say that there has not been any remission of duty in respect of licensed houses in Dublin, and the answer to the question is in the negative.
§ Mr. W. PEARCEConsidering the special circumstances of London, and the extraordinarily high assessments, will the right hon. Gentleman extend the mitigation, which is given to Ireland, to London?
§ Mr. LLOYD GEORGEI understand the question of the London assessment of public-houses is sub judice at the present moment, and I should not like to express any opinion. I believe there are appeals in several of those cases.
§ Mr. G. YOUNGERCan the right hon. Gentleman say whether the remission of Licence Duty on those Irish houses will not be granted by way of a reduction on the annual rental basis on which they are at present assessed for duty?
§ Mr. LLOYD GEORGEThe hon. Member has a question later on that point, and I shall hand in the answer.