HC Deb 10 February 1899 vol 66 c678
MR. FLYNN

I beg to ask Mr. Attorney-General for Ireland whether he is aware that at the last Winter Assizes held in Cork, Michael Minogue, a young lad 15 years of age, indicted for posting a threatening notice, was put on his trial a second time, the jury having disagreed on the first occasion; and, were these proceedings taken with the concurrence of the Law Advisers of the Crown in Ireland?

MR. ATKINSON

It is the fact that the prisoner referred to, who was, as I am informed, 17, and not 15, years of age, was put on his trial a second time, as it has never been understood that the age of a prisoner protects him from a second investigation of the charge against him. The answer to the second paragraph is in the affirmative.

MR. FLYNN

In this case, also, were not a large number of jurors ordered to stand aside, as in the case mentioned in the last Question?

MR. ATKINSON

Not that I am aware of.

MR. W. REDMOND

I call it a scandalous practice.