HC Deb 14 April 1899 vol 69 cc1114-5

Resolutions reported from the Committee;

  1. 1. "That, in the case of the East London Water Bill, Petition of the' Lea Conservancy Board' for dispensing with Standing Order 129 in the case of their Petition against the Bill, the said Standing Order ought to be dispensed with."
    2. 1115
  2. 2. "That, in the case of the Leicester Corporation Water Bill, Petition of 'William Jackson and Thomas Hughes Jackson' for dispensing with Standing Order 129 in the case of their Petition against the Bill, the said Standing Order ought to be dispensed with."
  3. 3. "That, in the case of the Derby Corporation Water Bill, Petition of 'William Jackson and Thomas Hughes Jackson' for dispensing with Standing Order 129 in the case of their Petition against the Bill, the said Standing Order ought to be dispensed with."
  4. 4. "That, in the case of the London and North Western Railway (Additional Powers) Bill, Petition for additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: —That the parties be permitted to introduce their additional Provision, if the Committee on the Bill think fit."
  5. 5. "That, in the case of the Lowestoft Promenade Pier Petition, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: —That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."

Resolutions agreed to.