HC Deb 15 June 1896 vol 41 cc1057-8
MR. HENNIKER HEATON (Canterbury)

I beg to ask the Secretary to the Treasury, as representing the Postmaster General, whether he is aware some thousands of copies of a circular, namely, a renewal notice, issued by the Mortgage Insurance Corporation, were recently subjected to the letter post rate, on the ground that a date had been inserted in the first paragraph; whether no objection was taken to a date inserted in a subsequent paragraph; whether the regulations regarding statements of account expressly authorise the insertion of dates without restriction; and, whether he will direct that the fines in the case referred to shall be remitted?

* MR. HANBURY

The Postmaster General is aware that a number of copies of the document referred to were charged with letter-postage. The document consisted of a circular as well as a statement of account or renewal notice, and while (the book post regulations allow any written dates to be inserted in the latter, the only date which can be inserted in a circular is the date of dispatch. The fact of a sender combining in one document a renewal notice and a circular letter containing other information cannot exempt the document from the regulations applicable to a circular. As therefore in this case the book-post regulations were infringed, the Postmaster General is unable to remit the charge.

MR. HENNIKER HEATON

asked whether, as it was admitted that the regulations were complicated, he would have them re-cast in a clear and intelligible form.

* MR. HANBURY

said he did not think the regulations were at present complicated.