HC Deb 22 July 1896 vol 43 c395

(1.) A holding vested in a purchaser by a vesting order under this Act shall continue to have appurtenant thereto and to he subject to, as the case may he, any previously existing easements, rights, and appurtenances; and any privilege previously in fact enjoyed, whether by permission of the landlord or otherwise, in such manner and for such time that, if the holding had belonged to a different owner from the rest of the estate, it would have been an easement or right, shall be an easement or right within the meaning of this section, and shall he appurtenant to or exercisable over the holding, as the case may he.

(2.) The vesting order may, if the Land Commission think fit, declare that the sale is made subject to or free from any particular easement, right, or appurtenance, and such declaration shall have full effect.

Clause ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Clause 29,—