HC Deb 10 August 1894 vol 28 cc562-3
MR. WEIR

I beg to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether, having regard to the fact that the Government declare their unwillingness to go on with the Crofters Act Amendment Bill, should it be opposed, he will state if any efforts have been made to arrive at an understanding with the Leader of the Opposition in order that this measure may be carried before the close of the Session; if no efforts in the direction indicated have been made, will he consider the desirability of making them forthwith, and, if possible, coming to an arrangement; and whether, seeing that the Government have a majority of from 30 to 40, he will re-consider his decision, and resolve to carry the Bill by the adoption of the Closure, if necessary?

SIR W. HARCOURT

I have already stated I did not propose to proceed with the Bill if it were opposed. The Government cannot carry a Bill by the Closure which they say they will not proceed with if it is opposed.

* MR. WEIR

Am I to understand that the Chancellor of the Exchequer objects to use his efforts and his talents on behalf of the Highland crofters in the manner indicated in my question?

DR. MACGREGOR (Inverness-shire)

May I ask whether the right hon. Gentleman is aware that the Prime Minister promised the crofters this measure this Session in his Edinburgh speech?

SIR W. HARCOURT

We should have been glad to have carried the Bill if we could; but, under the circumstances, we are unable to do so.

DR. MACGREGOR

You have not tried.

SIR W. HARCOURT

I know that my hon. Friend has promised to visit us with all kinds of pains and penalties in case this Bill is not carried; but I am afraid that we shall have to endure them.

DR. MACGREGOR

Is this Bill more contentious than other Bills—than the Budget, for instance?

SIR W. HARCOURT

I am afraid I can hardly ask the House to devote as much time to this Bill as to the Budget.