HC Deb 12 April 1892 vol 3 cc1232-4
MR. J. ROWLANDS (Finsbury, E.)

I beg to ask the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland if he will explain why it is the rule in Ireland that working men in boroughs who are duly entitled to be put upon the Parliamentary registers, under the qualification for successive occupation, are compelled to send in a claim, and to attend the Revision Court and prove the said claim, whereas in English boroughs it is usual for the overseers to put on the register persons who are qualified by successive occupation; whether he is aware that the law on this subject was discussed by the Court of Appeal in Ireland in 1889, in the case of "Lyons v. Chambers," when it was decided that the law was the same in Ireland as in England; and whether the 1st sub-section of the 7th section and the 5th sub-section of the 8th section of "The Representation of the People Act, 1884," and the 3rd section of "The Parliamentary Registration Act, 1885," have been, as regards working men changing houses, put into operation in Ireland at all?

THE CHIEF SECRETARY FOR IRELAND (Mr. JACKSON,) Leeds, N.

So far as I am aware, there is no rule in Ireland under which working men in boroughs are compelled to send in a claim and attend at the Revision Court, and I may add there is no difference in the registration law between the case of working men and any other class of persons entitled to the franchise. The case of "Lyons v. Chambers" decided that a claim was unnecessary in the case of persons whose qualification depended upon successive occupation. I have no reason to suppose that the persons who are entrusted with the duty of administering or interpreting the Acts mentioned have been neglecting those duties.

MR. BLANE

Does the right hon. Gentleman imply that in the case of qualification by successive occupation persons giving notice to the Town Clerk or Clerk of the Peace get on the register in the same way as in England when notice is given to the overseer?

MR. JACKSON

I understand there is no difference in the law.

MR. BLANE

It is entirely different in practice. I know from 20 years' experience.

MR. J. ROWLANDS

Do the authorities carry out the law in the same manner?

MR. JACKSON

As I have said, I have no reason to believe they neglect their duties.

MR. MAURICE HEALY (Cork)

In the case of "Lyon v. Chambers," did the Court of Appeal intimate that it was not a proper thing to put the person on the register without a claim?

MR. JACKSON

I am advised that the decision was contrary to that.

MR. BLANE

Will the right hon. Gentleman state whether the Statute and practice is not entirely different in England and Ireland?

MR. JACKSON

I cannot answer a general question of that kind. If the hon. Member will give me information as to any specific case I will make inquiries.