HC Deb 29 May 1891 vol 353 cc1310-1
MR. T. W. RUSSELL (Tyrone, S.)

I beg to ask the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland whether, in view of the fact that the Irish Land Department Bill cannot be proceeded with during the present Session, he will consider the propriety of embodying Clause 29 of that measure, which deals with long and perpetuity leaseholders, as a separate Bill, and so securing its passage this Session?

MR. A. J. BALFOUR

I am afraid it is true that the chance of passing the Land Department Bill this Session is very small, and it is also true, I believe, that it would not be in order to introduce Clause 29 of that measure into the Land Purchase Bill as an Amendment designed to give relief to long and perpetuity leaseholders. But I cannot undertake to introduce a separate Bill embodying Clause 29 of the Land Department Bill unless I could be assured that it would meet with general acceptance.

MR. T. W. RUSSELL

As far as I can judge, there is nobody on this side of the House who would oppose such a measure. The Irish Members are unanimous in holding that a clause of this kind ought to be passed.

MR. A. J. BALFOUR

The point is whether there would be any opposition to the proposed Bill from any quarter of the House. If the hon. Member can give me an assurance that from no quarter of the House will there be opposition I will consider the matter.

MR. SEXTON

May I ask you, Sir, whether it would be out of order to move that the clause be introduced into the Land Purchase Bill?

MR. SPEAKER

As the Committee stage has now been closed, I cannot give an opinion before the question is raised as a point of order on the Land Bill itself.