§ DR. TANNER (Cork Co., Mid)asked the Secretary to the Treasury. Whether he is aware that there is at Ballycotton in the middle of the harbour a mass of rubbish 90 feet long, 60 feet wide, and three feet in depth, deposited there by the contractor in the course of construction of the pier; and, what authority had the Board of Works to grant an additional £600 to the contractor for removing a portion of the rubbish deposited in the harbour contrary to specification?
§ SIR HERBERT MAXWELL (A LORD of the TREASURY) (Wigton)(who replied) said: I am not aware that the statement in the first paragraph of this Question is correct. The second paragraph appears to be based on a misapprehension; £598 was paid to the contractor for extras beyond his contract, not for removing obstructions. An expense of £444 has been incurred—£370 for removing projecting rocks, and £74 for removing some loose stones in the harbour.
§ DR. TANNERasked, by what authority the extra money had been paid?
§ SIR HERBERT MAXWELLasked for Notice of the Question.
§ MR. FLYNN (Cork, N.)asked whether, considering the allegation of the local bodies as to the unsuitability of the pier, the Board of Works would institute an independent inquiry?
§ SIR HERBERT MAXWELLasked for Notice of this Question also.