SECOND READING. (Hansard, 31 July 1883)

§ MR. TOMLINSON
said, the Bill was one of a very exceptional character, and contained some peculiar provisions. For instance, there was a provision making the master of a vessel liable to a penalty for matters with which he had nothing to do. But a much more important part of the Bill, which he thought ought not to have been introduced at that late 1218 time of the Session, had reference to the funds of Friendly Societies. Though the Bill had been for a number of days before the public, sufficient time had not been given for its consideration; and he thought some explanation ought, at least, to be given before the House was asked to reduce the interest on the funds of Friendly Societies invested in Government securities. It was his belief that the cost of managing these funds was not so great as to absorb the difference between 2½ per cent and the present rate of 2d. per day. He would, therefore, move the adjournment of the debate.

§ MR. WARTON
said, it was too bad, at that time of the morning, to propose alterations which would work cruel injustice to Friendly Societies. This sort of thing was becoming intolerable. There were considerations higher than Friendly Societies. People invested their small savings, and a proposition of this sort ought to be brought forward before a sufficiently large House to give it proper consideration.

§ Mr. SPEAKER
stated he thought the Noes had it; and, his decision being challenged, he directed the Ayes to stand up in their places, and Three Members only having stood up, Mr. SPEAKER declared the Noes had it.