HC Deb 27 March 1882 vol 268 cc32-3
MR. GREGORY

asked the First Lord of the Treasury, Whether it is understood by the promoters of the Channel Tunnels that they are proceeding with their respective undertakings entirely at their own risk, and that they will have no claim for compensation in case it should be considered necessary, for the defence of the Realm, to stop or suspend their works, or at any time to take possession of them, or of the Tunnel, when constructed, for such purpose?

MR. GLADSTONE

In answer to this Question, I have to state that a letter was addressed on the 6th of March to Sir Edward Watkin, as Chairman of the Company which is now engaged in cer- tain works with a view to the execution of the Tunnel, and in this letter those who are spending money on the works—that is to say, the shareholders of the Company—are informed that the Government reserves its right to use any power which it may possess in any way that may seem to be for the best interests of the country. That, I think, is the only manner in which the question can be dealt with at present. In regard to the latter part of the Question—namely, whether there is power at any time to take possession of the Tunnel when constructed—that rather presumed that arrangements have been made for the construction of the Tunnel, which at present is not the case.

MR. GREGORY

Would the Government exercise that power without the compensation?

MR. GLADSTONE

I apprehend there is no doubt of that as to the present works.

MR. O'SHEA

Has Sir Edward Watkin been informed whether he has a right to go beyond the foreshore?

MR. GLADSTONE

I believe Sir Edward Watkin is very well informed as to all matters connected with the Company over which he presides, and it is not at all necessary for us to inform him on these matters.