HC Deb 10 February 1882 vol 266 cc472-3
MR. THOMAS COLLINS

pointed out that the second part of the Motion, which he now begged to move, was consequential upon the first.

Motion made, and Question proposed, That no Motion be made for a new Writ for the Cities of Oxford and Gloucester, or the Borough of Sandwich, without two days' previous Notice with the Votes, and that such Notice be considered before Orders of the Day or Notices of Motions."—(Mr. Thomas Collins.)

MR. WARTON

asked whether it was proposed to deal with the Cities of Canterbury and Chester and the boroughs of Macclesfield and Boston in the same way as those boroughs named in the second Motion of the hon. Member for Knaresborough?

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (Sir HENRY JAMES)

said, that these places were included in the first Motion of the hon. Member as seats that had been declared void on the ground of bribery, and for that reason there could be no allusion to them in the second Motion of his hon. Friend.

Question put, and agreed to.