HC Deb 18 August 1881 vol 265 cc214-5
MR. O'DONNELL

asked the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, Whether Ennishowen was one of the most acutely distressed districts during the scarcity of 1879 and 1880; whether Ennishowen was not also remarkably free from crime of any serious description; whether Messrs. Crampsey and Diver, arrested under the Coercion Acts on suspicion of attending an illegal assembly, have suffered an imprisonment twice as long as would be incurred for a similar offence, if proved, in England; whether Government had not shortly previous to Mr. Crampsey's arrest accepted his bail to be of good conduct for twelve months, which bail has not been forfeited; and, whether there are any pressing reasons why Messrs. Crampsey and Diver should not be released, and allowed to resume their care of their business?

MR. W. E. FORSTER

, in reply, said, he did not believe that Ennishowen was one of the most acutely distressed districts during the scarcity of 1879 and 1880, nor was it free from crime of a serious description. The district required to be proclaimed, and 66 additional police to be appointed. The persons named were arrested on reasonable suspicion of a crime for which two years' imprisonment could be given. Since their arrest the district had been more peaceable; but he could not recommend their release.

MR. O'DONNELL

pointed out that the right hon. Gentleman had not answered the fourth part of the Question, as to the non-forfeiture of Mr. Crampsey's bail.

MR. W. E. FORSTER

On that point I have no information. I telegraphed yesterday for it, and I have no doubt that if the hon. Member repeats the Question three days hence I will be able to answer it.