HC Deb 05 March 1869 vol 194 cc774-5

Order for Second Reading read.

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Bill be now read a second time."—(Mr. West.)

MR. CROSS

said, he believed the principle was a right one. It was much better for the interests of the country that people who lived in such populous districts as Manchester and Liverpool should have the opportunity of suing in this court, without going to Preston for the purpose of having their proceedings passed. Attornies practising in those parts would as soon have their pleadings carried on in London as in Preston. He should like to have some assurance, however, that the present officer of the court at Preston would not be damaged by the Bill, and that time would be given for the consideration of its details.

MR. BAZLEY

said, he was convinced that the measure would prove to be of great practical utility. The Bill had the sanction of some of the most eminent legal men in Lancashire. He therefore gave it his support.

MR. HERMON

said, he hoped the hon. Gentleman who had charge of the Bill would consent to postpone the second reading.

MR. WEST

thanked his hon. and learned Friend the Member for Southwest Lancashire (Mr. Cross) for the favourable opinion he had given, as no one, from his experience of the way in which business was conducted in the court, was better able to form an opinion as to the merits of the Bill. The Bill was generally approved of in Lancashire, and he could assure the House that the present prothonotary would not be subjected to any loss, but, on the contrary, the position of that officer would be improved by the passing of the Act.

MR. AYRTON

observed that if no objection was made to the second reading of the Bill, the Government must not be understood to acquiesce in all its provisions. There were some clauses, particularly those relating to fees, which required consideration.

MR. SERJEANT SIMON

declared his desire to see these ancient courts swept away and local courts established throughout the country, and justice made accessible to all classes. That would best be done by a great and comprehensive scheme of legislation. He abstained from opposing the Bill, on the ground that as long as this court lasted—and he hoped it would not last long—they should make it as efficacious as they could.

Motion agreed to.

Bill read a second time, and committed for Monday 5th April.