HC Deb 26 June 1843 vol 70 cc390-3
Viscount Palmerston

objected to the 11th clause of the bill. It appeared to him to be directed against a particular individual, Lieutenant Burslam, and it would have the effect of an ex post facto law.

Sir James Graham

said, it appeared to him that the clause would inflict a personal hardship; but upon consultation with the highest judicial authorities, he was of opinion that the clause should pass, and that it should do so for the purpose of effecting that particular case alluded to.

Mr. Thesiger

considered that such a mode of legislation was unprecedented in this country. It never before, at least, had been avowed. Lieutenant Burslam had taken advantage of the law, as he had a right to do, and it would be monstrous now to deprive him of that which the law gave him.

Bill went through committee. To be reported.

The House adjourned at half-past one.