§ On the motion that the Salmon Fisheries (Scotland) Bill (No. 2) be re-committed,
Mr. Mackenziemoved that the report be taken into further consideration that day three months. He objected to different clauses of the bill, which was such a mass of inconsistencies that it could not possibly be carried into practical operation.
Mr. E. Ellice,jun., remarked that the opposition to this measure did not proceed from any parties representing districts likely to be affected by the bill.
§ Mr. A. Campbellsaid, he could refute the hon. Member's observation in his own person. He was personally interested in salmon fisheries, and he was strongly opposed to the bill before the House.
§ The House divided on the original question:—Ayes 88; Noes 20: Majority 68.
| List of the NOES.* | |
| Blackstone, W.S. | Manners, Lord J. |
| Broadley, H. | Marton, G. |
| Buckley, E. | O'Brien, A. S. |
| Carnegie, hon.Capt. | Polhill, F. |
| Cochrane, A. | Pollington, Visct. |
| Connolly, Col. | Rushbrooke, Col. |
| Duncombe, hon.O. | Taylor, T. E. |
| Gordon, hon. Capt. | Waddington, H. S. |
| Greenaway, C | |
| Hamilton, J.H. | TELLERS |
| Hanmer, Sir J. | Mackenzie, W. F |
| Hodgson, ft. | Forbes, W. |
§ Bill re-committed and went through committee. The House resumed.