HC Deb 18 April 1806 vol 6 c805

On the motion for the second reading of this bill,

General Gascoyne,

disapproved of the principle of the bill altogether, and asked whether counsel might not be heard against it at a future stage; and was informed by the speaker that they might.

Sir W. Young

approved of the principle of the bill, which he considered as a boon to the West-India merchants, and stated that he had been at a numerous meeting of London merchants, where; a majority had agreed with him.

General Gascoyne

again rose, and was called to order by Mr. Wilberforce; but being informed by the speaker that he was in order, he proceeded to state that, in his opinion, this bill was a scheme indirectly to abolish the slave trade, which could not be done in an open and direct manner.

Sir W. Curtis

thought the slave trade an evil that could not be remedied, but he never purchased a slave himself. He heard nothing of the meeting of merchants adverted to by the hon. baronet.

Mr. Brooke

approved the principle of the bill, which he considered as beneficial to the West-India merchants.—The bill was then read a 2d time.