HC Deb 27 May 1805 vol 5 cc119-21

On the motion of sir J. Wrottesley a new writ was ordered for a member to server in parliament for the borough of Dornoc, Tain, and Dingwall, in the room of the hon. John Villiers, who has accepted the Chiltern hundreds.—Mr. Grey presented a petition from the gentlemen freeholders and electors of the county of Northumberland, congratulating the house on the votes of the 8th and 10th of April relative to the tenth naval report. The petition was ordered to lie on the table; as was also one from the inhabitants of the town and county of the town of Southampton. See vol. iv. p. 622, where the said petitions were inadvertently inserted.—Mr. Serjeant Best moved for leave to bring in a bill to amend an act of the 4th year of his present majesty, to prevent delay in proceedings relative to Bankrupts having the privilege of parliament granted.—The attorney general, pursuant to notice, moved for leave to bring in a bill to amend the act of last session, for facilitating the arrest of offenders escaping from one part of the united kingdom to another, or from one country to another. He had deferred this motion hitherto, lest it might appear, if he had brought it forward earlier, to be a prejudging of a case pending in the courts of the sister kingdom. That case had been decided, and therefore he felt himself at liberty to bring forward his measure. The object he had in view, was simply to enable a magistrate in Ireland who magistrate in England, to give the same bail as if the warrant had been issued in that country, and vice versa. The charge, that he had framed the measure of last session with a view to bring Mr. justice Johnson a prisoner to attend his trial in this country, would fall before a statement of a fact. The bill had been prepared by order of the secretary of state the preceding session, though, from the advanced stage of the session, it had obtained leave to bring in the bill some days previous to the conviction of Mr. Cobbett; and it was not till some days after, when the original manuscripts had been given up by Mr. Cobbett, the Mr. justice Johnson could be considered as the object of a prosecution, leave was given to bring in the bill.—Mr. Foster obtained leave to bring in a bill to continue the act for appointing commissioners of enquiry into fees, gratuities, perquisites, and emoluments in offices, in Ireland.—The report of the ballot for the committee on the 11th naval report was brought up; the following are the gentlemen chosen: lord Glenbervie. Geo. Canning, esq. lord Henry Petty, Robert Holt Leigh, esq. the right hon. Denis Browne, D. Giles, esq. Mr. Serjeant Best, Bragge Bathurst, esq. B. Hobhouse, esq. J. Campbell, esq. S. Barne, esq. C. W. Wynne, esq. C. S. Hawthorne, esq. R. Steele, esq. C. M. Ormsby, esq. P. Patten, esq. J. Kingston, esq. sir Robert Vaughan, bart. M. P. Andrews, esq. H. Joddrell, esq. lord Binning. Seven were empowered to be a quorum, and the committee was authorised to adjourn from time to time. Sir W. Elford, considering that to any man of common understanding the testimony of lord St. Vincent had been contradicted by the written documents existing in the correspondence between his Lordship, sir A. Hamond, and lord Buckinghamshire, gave notice that he should move tomorrow, that those papers should be referred to the said committee, and that they should report thereon.—On the motion of the chancellor of the exchequer, it was left to a select committee to draw up an answer to the message of the lords, desiring to be informed as to the reasons for requesting the attendance of earl St. Vincent to be examined as to the repairs of the Romney and La Sensible, commanded by sir H. Popham.—The attorney-general moved the order of the day, for taking into further consideration the report of the Stipendiary Curates' bill, when several new clauses were brought up, and amendments proposed, which produced a desultory conversation between the attorney-general, lord Porchester, Mr. I. H. Browne, &c. The bill was then ordered to be printed as amended, and read a third time on Thursday.—The Universities Advowson bill was committed. On the motion for the receiving of the report, Mr. Fellowes stated, as his objection to the bill, that it would remove the old men from the universities, and consequently allow too much liberty to the younger. The chancellor of the exchequer said, he hoped, in a future stage, he should be able to remove any objection that might be had to it. The report was then received, and the bill ordered to be read a third time on Friday.—Mr. Rose brought up the Free Port bill, which was read a first time, and ordered to be read. a second time to-morrow.—The Dublin Paving bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed on Thursday.—The reports of the Irish Stamp Duty bill, and Malt Duty bill, were severally received, and the bills ordered to be read a third time on Thursday.—The Irish Excise Licence bill was committed, and the report ordered to be received to morrow.—The report of the Paymaster General's Regulation bill was brought up, and the bill ordered to be read a third time on Thursday.—The Irish Election bill was read a third time and passed.—The Post Horse Farming Duty bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed to-morrow.— Colonel Stanley brought up the report of the committee to whom the claims of the Duke of Atholl had been referred, and moved that it should be taken into consideration on Thursday next. A very long conversation took place upon Mr. Curwen's moving as an amendment, that it should be taken into further consideration on Wednesday se'nnight. The hon. gent. thought that the delay would be necessary, in order to enable the house to understand the important points of the case, for which purpose he thought that the papers ought to be printed. Lord Glenbervie had no objection to the printing the papers, but thought that there should be no delay in taking the subject into consideration.—The further consideration of the report was fixed for Wednesday se'nnight.