Legislative reform order: Lords procedure determination Minister recommends the instrument follow the affirmative procedure

Overview Work packages Calculation styles Steps Steps with depths Routes Route checker Clocks Step collections

The way legislative reform orders are scrutinised is not fixed. When ministers lay a draft legislative reform order, they propose what level of scrutiny it should face. Under the affirmative procedure, both Houses have 40 days to consider the draft order and then have to actively approve it before it’s made.

There are 0 business items.

Procedure identifier

https://id.parliament.uk/meSrUdup

SPARQL queries used by this page

PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
      PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
      PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/>
      PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/>
      SELECT distinct ?Procedure ?ProcedureName ?step ?stepName ?description ?legislature ?legislatureName ?CommonsId ?LordsId ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel WHERE {
        ?Procedure a :Procedure;
                   :name ?ProcedureName.
           filter (?Procedure in (id:meSrUdup))
        optional {  ?Procedure :procedureHasProcedureRoute ?Route.
          ?Route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep|:procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?step.
          optional {?step :procedureStepDescription ?description}
          ?step :name ?stepName.
        ?step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType.
               ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel.}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature.
          ?legislature :name ?legislatureName.}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?CommonsId
          filter (?CommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?LordsId.
            filter (?LordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))}
        filter (?step IN (id:o4e5B7ry))
        } order by ?stepName

PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
      PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
      PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/>
      PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/>
      SELECT distinct ?businessItem ?businessItemDate ?businessItemLink ?workPackage ?workPackagedThing ?workPackagedThingName ?madeAvailableDate ?Procedure ?ProcedureName ?step ?stepName ?legislature ?legislatureName ?CommonsId ?LordsId ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel  WHERE {
        ?Procedure a :Procedure;
                   :name ?ProcedureName.
           filter (?Procedure in (id:meSrUdup))
        ?Procedure :procedureHasWorkPackage ?workPackage.
        ?workPackage :workPackageHasWorkPackagedThing ?workPackagedThing.
        ?workPackagedThing :name ?workPackagedThingName. 
        optional {  ?Procedure :procedureHasProcedureRoute ?Route.
          ?Route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep|:procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?step.
          ?step :name ?stepName.
        ?step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType.
               ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel.}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature.
          ?legislature :name ?legislatureName.}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?CommonsId
          filter (?CommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?LordsId.
            filter (?LordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))}
        filter (?step IN (id:o4e5B7ry))
       ?step :procedureStepHasBusinessItem ?businessItem.
        optional{ ?businessItem :businessItemDate ?businessItemDate.}
              optional {?businessItem :businessItemHasBusinessItemWebLink ?businessItemLink }
        ?businessItem :businessItemHasWorkPackage ?workPackage.
       optional {?workPackage :workPackageHasBusinessItem ?bi1 .
                  ?bi1 :businessItemHasProcedureStep ?madeAvailable;
                         :businessItemDate ?madeAvailableDate.
                  filter (?madeAvailable in (id:isWn7s3K, id:cspzmb6w, id:ITNO9JWr, id:otscOTzB))}
         }  order by DESC(?businessItemDate)  ?workPackagedThingName