Proposed negative statutory instrument Business step
A Minister may exercise powers under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 or the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 to propose that instruments be subject to the proposed negative procedure. After a proposed negative instrument has been laid, each House has ten sitting days in which it may consider the instrument and agree with the proposal of the Minister, or instead recommend the instrument be subject to the draft affirmative procedure. In the Commons, the instrument is considered by the European Statutory Instruments Committee. In the Lords, the instrument is considered by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee. Any result of consideration does not bind a Minister, who must nevertheless make a written statement if disagreeing with a recommendation of a committee.
Follows the calculation style Proposed negative statutory instruments.
There are 30 steps.
- Business and Trade Committee agreed that the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)
- Business and Trade Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- Committee sifting period ends
- Considered by the Business and Trade Committee (House of Commons)
- Considered by the Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (House of Commons)
- Considered by the European Statutory Instruments Committee (ESIC) (House of Commons)
- Considered by the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) (House of Commons)
- Considered by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)
- Considered by the Transport Committee (House of Commons)
- Energy Security and Net Zero Committee agreed that the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)
- Energy Security and Net Zero Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- European Statutory Instruments Committee (ESIC) agreed that the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)
- European Statutory Instruments Committee (ESIC) recommended that the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- Further information published by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)
- Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons)
- Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords)
- Ministerial statement of disagreement with sifting recommendation (House of Commons)
- Ministerial statement of disagreement with sifting recommendation (House of Lords)
- Procedure concluded in the House of Commons and the House of Lords (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Proposed negative statutory instrument created
- Proposed negative statutory instrument withdrawn from the House of Commons (House of Commons)
- Proposed negative statutory instrument withdrawn from the House of Lords (House of Lords)
- Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) agreed that the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)
- Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) agreed that the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Lords)
- Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) recommended that the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Lords)
- Statutory instrument can be laid under the negative procedure
- Statutory instrument should be laid under the affirmative procedure
- Transport Committee agreed that the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)
- Transport Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)