§ Mr. MeacherTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the current percentage collection rate by each local authority for the poll tax; what is the shortfall in revenue; and by how much poll tax rates would have to be increased in each case to compensate for the loss of revenue from non-payment.
§ Mr. PortilloThe Government have no comprehensive information on current collection rates. We shall be receiving details of collection rates at 30 September 1990 from local authorities and this information will be collated and made available to the local authority associations in the same way as was the information for 30 June.
§ Mr. David NicholsonTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish in theOfficial Report the latest figures he has for actual spending in 1989–90 and planned spending in 1990–91 for (a) each of the London boroughs, (b) the metropolitan districts of Salford, Stockport, Trafford, Sefton, Wirral, Coventry, Sandwell, Bradford and Leeds and (c) the shire counties of Cambridgeshire, Devon, Dorset, Gloucestershire, Hereford and Worcestershire, Kent, Oxfordshire, Somerset and Wiltshire.
§ Mr. KeyThe available information is as follows:
Net revenue expenditure provisional outturn 1989–90 and budget estimates 1990–91 Provisional outturn 1989–90 £'000s Budget estimates 1990–91 £'000s Cambridgeshire 304,500 335,093 Devon 456,617 519,332 Dorset 273,158 304,476 Gloucestershire 241,871 274,190 Hereford and Worcester 292,162 320,493 Kent 661,425 760,000 Oxfordshire 247,861 291,554 Somerset 234,537 250,951 Wiltshire 261,404 285,110 Salford 151,658 163,400 606W
Total expenditure1 final outturn 1985–86 to 1989–90. Net revenue expenditure2 provisional outturn 1980–90 and budget estimates 1990–91 Final Outturn 1985–86 £'000 Final Outturn 1986–87 £'000 Final Outturn 1987–88 £'000 Final Outturn 1988–89 £'000 Provisional Outturn 1989–90 £'000 Budget Estimate 1990–91 £'000 Suffolk 197,896 218,200 230,942 254,492 276,116 318,718 Babergh 3,061 2,520 3,088 3,557 3,534 4,636 Forest Heath 2,540 1,968 1,983 2,275 3,031 3,781 Ipswich 7,934 8,865 10,292 10,997 14,982 17,782 Mid Suffolk 3,010 2,807 3,274 3,368 3,783 6,064 St. Edmundsbury 3,181 3,296 3,283 2,546 4,095 5,020 Suffolk Coastal 4,101 3,978 4,758 4,744 6,300 9,081 Waveney 5,244 5,275 5,874 6,574 7,230 8,229
Provisional outturn 1989–90 £'000s Budget estimates 1990–91 £'000s Stockport 141,575 168,761 Trafford 107,869 130,610 Sefton 146,770 179,143 Wirral 191,520 218,160 Coventry 192,636 218,115 Sandwell 187,208 223,558 Bradford 297,477 331,843 Leeds 358,442 422,348 City of London 76,160 67,873 Camden 147,683 180,685 Greenwich 99,721 221,596 Hackney 135,825 236,000 Islington 127,107 195,118 Kensington and Chelsea 65,004 117,458 Lewisham 117,997 207,292 Southwark 159,513 231,020 Tower Hamlets 124,538 212,471 Wandsworth 92,579 242,772 Westminster 106,317 173,617 Barking and Dagenham 85,292 99,852 Barnet 150,595 169,842 Bexley 118,358 124,602 Brent 228,953 238,444 Bromley 134,747 150,238 Croydon 165,362 189,838 Ealing 197,583 222,964 Enfield 153,003 170,417 Harrow 112,640 126,455 Havering 119,620 133,290 Hillingdon 138,020 155,194 Kingston-Upon-Thames 76,805 83,679 Merton 91,290 117,016 Newham 204,721 213,940 Redbridge 114,644 132,619 Richmond-Upon-Thames 81,034 90,376 Sutton 91,909 105,360 Waltham Forest 167,193 183,019 In 1990–91 information for capped authorities shows the position after capping.
Information is not yet available from Hammersmith and Fulham, Lambeth, Haringey and Hounslow.
§ Mr. IrvineTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, what was(a) the capital expenditure and (b) the revenue expenditure of (i) Baleigh district council, (ii) Forest Heath district council, (iii) Ipswich borough council, (iv) Mid-Suffolk district council, (v) St. Edmundsbury district council, (vi) Suffolk Coastal district council, (vii) Waveney district council and (viii) Suffolk county council in each year from (1) 1985–86 and (2) to 1990–91.
§ Mr. KeyThe information is as follows:
607W
Gross capital expenditure 1985–86 to 1990–91 1985–86 £'000 1986–87 £'000 1987–88 £'000 1988–89 £'000 1989–1990 £'000 1990–91 £'000 Suffolk 18,079 24,605 24,703 35,173 34,995 44,330 Babergh 3,792 4,999 2,736 5,814 7,149 7,146 Forest Heath 2,112 2,474 4,217 5,117 7,669 6,653 Ipswich 15,486 14,615 10,203 18,993 22,549 17,193 Mid Suffolk 6,007 6,237 6,757 6,834 8,650 7,712 St. Edmundsbury 8,821 7,391 8,183 7,304 12,956 14,100 Suffolk Coastal 3,250 4,789 6,298 6,897 9,166 6,084 Waveney 5,306 5,991 6,771 8,333 8,343 11,114 1Total expenditure as defined in the rate support grant system. 2Net revenue expenditure as defined in revenue support grant system.
§ Mr. IrvineTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will detail the amounts received by(a) Baleigh district council, (b) Forest Heath district council, (c) Ipswich borough council, (d) Mid-Suffolk district council, (e) St. Edmundsbury district council, (f) Suffolk coastal district council, (g) Waveney district council, (h)
Rate Support Grant 1985–86 to 1989–90 1985–86 £'000 1986–87 £'000 1987–88 £'000 1988–89 £'000 1989–90 £'000 Suffolk 71,583 70,640 75,740 78,863 71,898 Babergh 2,212 2,456 2,318 2,182 1,096 Forest Heath 1,748 1,820 1,818 1,684 1,761 Ipswich 4,834 4,778 3,482 3,027 3,384 Mid Suffolk 2,086 2,312 2,269 2,115 2,134 St. Edmundsbury 2,341 2,445 2,489 2,363 2,390 Suffolk Coastal 2,833 3,137 2,807 2,289 2,663 Waveney 4,221 4,528 4,606 4,721 4,927
Relevant Specific Grant 1985–86 to 1989–90 1985–86 £'000 1986–87 £'000 1987–88 £'000 1988–89 £'000 1989–90 £'000 Suffolk 16,629 19,098 21,485 23,787 25,564 Babergh 787 821 863 1,003 1,013 Forest Heath 273 287 332 332 368 Ipswich 1,984 2,139 2,573 2,558 2,811 Mid Suffolk 669 754 818 885 1,013 St. Edmundsbury 524 555 664 677 828 Suffolk Coastal 1,240 1,310 1,531 1,583 1,844 Waveney 1,578 1,749 2,048 2,119 2,367
Domestic rates 1985–86 to 1989–90 1985–86 £'000 1986–87 £'000 1987–88 £'000 1988–89 £'000 1989–90 £'000 Babergh 8,814 10,724 11,596 12,882 14,428 Forest Heath 5,367 6,601 7,086 7,933 9,108 Ipswich 14,438 17,013 18,956 20,757 24,102 Mid Suffolk 7,853 9,646 10,599 11,778 13,544 St. Edmundsbury 9,312 11,312 12,395 13,908 15,353 Suffolk Coastal 13,394 16,433 18,403 20,590 22,858 Waveney 11,275 13,549 15,058 16,529 18,379 608W
Non-domestic rates 1985–86 to 1989–90 1985–86 £'000 1986–87 £'000 1987–88 £'000 1988–89 £'000 1989–90 £'000 Babergh 6,321 7,531 8,044 8,743 9,725 Forest Heath 4,818 5,845 6,401 7,160 8,142 Ipswich 18,102 20,965 22,806 24,731 28,445 Mid Suffolk 5,513 6,586 7,129 7,817 8,913 St. Edmundsbury 9,524 11,287 12,344 13,649 14,985 Suffolk Coastal 10,276 12,397 13,628 15,568 17,185 Waveney 7,409 8,721 9,575 10,524 11,618 Suffolk county council by way of (i) rate revenue support grant, (ii) specific grants, (iii) non-domestic rates and (iv) domestic rates and community charge in each year from (1) 1985–86 to 1990–91.
§ Mr. KeyThe information is as follows:
609W
1990–91 Revenue support grant £'000 Specific grants within AEF £'000 Community charge income £'000 Income from non-domestic rate pool £'000 Suffolk 0 29,169 0 0 Babergh 8,409 124 19,666 17,525 Forest Heath 5,366 113 11,740 9,902 Ipswich 14,458 255 40,682 26,633 Mid Suffolk 8,403 103 19,582 16,976 St. Edmundsbury 9,623 173 22,556 20,192 Suffolk Coastal 11,272 142 30,208 22,253 Waveney 11,894 256 28,297 23,966 Notes:
1. Domestic rates gross of rate rebates but net of rate relief grant.
2. Community charge income gross of charge benefits and transitional relief grant.
3. Income from the non-domestic rate pool is distributed in proportion to relevant population (£292.51 per adult). It is not comparable with income from non-domestic ratepayers in earlier years.
§ Ms. HarmanTo ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a table showing the relationship of community charge to rates in the manner of his answer to the hon. Member for Ealing, Acton (Sir G. Young) on 19 June,Official Report, column 480, using actual rates of community charge set by local authorities.
§ Mr. KeyThe analyses already provided offer the most valid illustration of the distributional effects of the introduction of the community charge system. Use of actual community charges would not provide a proper comparison with 1989–90 rates since increases in local authority spending mean that the community charge is raising 30 per cent. more revenue than was raised by domestic rates.