§ Mr. Lathamasked the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received from the East Midlands Play Association opposing his decision to integrate Play Board with the Sports Council; and what reply he has sent.
§ Mr. TraceyNone. However, I am aware that the proposals to merge Play Board's functions with those of the Sports Council have not been fully understood and, as a result, have caused some concerns. The proposals are not, as seems to be widely believed, designed to merge "play" into "sport"; they are aimed at achieving a strengthening of the campaign to raise the profile of play.
Over the past three years Play Board has succeeded in bringing to the fore the needs of children for proper play facilities and opportunities. I agree with the board that more remains to be done and a national focus for play remains important. I believe, however, that this role needs to be given added impetus through having an ability to grant-aid facilities and projects, for which additional funds from the private sector should be generated. It is for this purpose that I consider play should be brought within the structure and role of a major, established body—one with a track record for achieving results, for raising private sector funds, and value for money.
Consequently I have proposed to Play Board that its function and role should be merged with the Sports Council. The two bodies have agreed to enter into negotiations with us to identify the best way forward acceptable to both parties and to the Government. Those negotiations started on 25 November and I know that "play's" separate identity and needs are going to form an important part of the future discussions. Nevertheless, I am hopeful that the two organisations will reach agreement on future arrangements for the greater benefit of children's play.