§ Mr. Soleyasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish in the Official Report the following information on the mining dispute: (a) the number of police sent out of each police force area for duty in connection with the dispute during each week of the dispute; (b) the number of police injured in each police force area; (c) how many were seriously injured; and (d) how many were treated in hospital other than as outpatients.
175W
§ Mr. Maudeasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many policemen to date have been injured while carrying out duties connected with the mining dispute.
§ Mr. Giles ShawThe following numbers of police officers have been injured, in the period from 13 March to 16 November inclusive, in dealing with events arising from the miners' dispute:
Police force area Numbers injured Cleveland 2 Derbyshire 236 Durham 30 Dyfed-Powys 1 Essex 7 Greater Manchester 13 Gwent 1 Humberside 2 Kent 55 Lancashire 1 Leicestershire 1 Merseyside 4 Metropolitan 4 Norfolk 15 Northumbria 32 North Wales 1 North Yorkshire 14 Nottighamshire 130 South Wales 13 South Yorkshire 323 Staffordshire 18 Sussex 2 Thames Valley 2 Warwickshire 1 West Yorkshire 254 Total 1,162 The information requested about the number of police sent out of each police force area for duty in connection with the dispute and about the seriousness of police injuries is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
§ Mr. Soleyasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will publish in the Official Report the following information; (a) the number of written complaints about police conduct during the dispute received in each police force area and (b) the general nature of these complaints.
§ Mr. MellorThe following tables set out the only information which is available centrally. It relates to the period 13 March to 13 November 1984 and indicates the number of complaints received in each police force area (not the number of complaints made about officers of those forces). It does not distinguish between complaints made in writing and those made orally.
176W
Force area Number of complaints Cheshire 3 Derbyshire 57 Durham 19 Dyfed-Powys 1 Essex 1 Greater Manchester 6 Gwent 15 Humberside 4 Kent 15
Force area Number of complaints Lancashire 4 Lincolnshire 2 Merseyside 5 Metropolitan 4 Northumbria 16 North Wales 2 North Yorkshire 1 Nottinghamshire 61 South Wales 9 South Yorkshire 159 Staffordshire 6 Thames Valley 1 Warwickshire 23 West Yorkshire 6 All others 0 TOTAL 420 The following table indicates the nature of the allegations made (some of the complaints in the previous table will have related to more than one type of allegation):
Allegation Numbers Assault 198 Damage 16 Harassment 61 Incivility 83 Irregular Procedure 53 Motoring Offence 7 Neglect of Duty 13 Unlawful arrest 11 Oppressive conduct 31
§ Mr. Peter Bruinvelsasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police have been injured and from which force area in each of the last four weeks whilst policing the mining dispute.
§ Mr. Giles ShawThe following numbers of police officers have been injured, in the period from 17 October to 16 November inclusive., in dealing with events arising from the miners' dispute:
Police force area Numbers injured Derbyshire 17 Durham 8 Dyfed-Powys 1 Greater Manchester 2 Kent 1 Lancashire 1 Northumbria 10 South Wales 6 South Yorkshire 56 West Yorkshire 146 TOTAL 248 The table above gives the police force areas in which the injuries occurred. Information about the police forces from which the injured officers come is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate expense.
§ Mr. Peter Bruinvelsasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what information he has regarding length of time in bringing to court people charged with offences arising out of the mining dispute.
§ Mr. MellorComprehensive information on the length of time taken to bring people to court in these circumstances could not be collected without disproportionate effort. I would, however, refer my hon. Friend to 177W the estimates recently obtained from certain magistrates' courts which were set out in the reply I gave to a question from my hon. Friend the Member for Bedfordshire, North (Mr. Skeet) on 14 November, at columns 240–41.