HC Deb 17 November 1977 vol 939 cc332-41W
Mr. Michael Latham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will list the local authorities which have applied to him in the current financial year for land acquisitions under the Community Land Scheme of a planning or social nature, as outlined in paragraph 14 of GNLA/12, giving the total bid in each case and the amount which he has approved.

Mr. Guy Barnett

The information for county areas is contained in the following tables. Some of the proposals are still under consideration; a number are not expected to require loan sanction until the next financial year.

surplus accounts to him for (a) 1975–76, and (b) 1976–77, giving in each case the total level of (1) expenditure, (2) income, (3) deficit, or (4) surplus.

Mr. Guy Barnett

The total level of expenditure and deficit in 1975–76 was £1.7 million. There was no income and no surplus. For 1976–77, the total levels of expenditure, income, deficits and surplus, for the authorities listed as follows, were respectively £19.0 million, £0.8 million, £18.2 million, and nil.

Hereford and Worcester CC

  • Hereford City
  • Leominster
  • Malvern Hills
  • Redditch
  • South Herefordshire
  • Worcester City
  • Wychavon
  • Wyre Forest

Salop CC

  • Bridgnorth
  • North Shropshire
  • Oswestry
  • Shrewsbury and Atcham
  • South Shropshire
  • Wrekin

Warwicks CC

  • Kennet
  • North Wiltshire
  • Rugby
  • Salisbury
  • Stratford-on-Avon
  • Thamesdown
  • Warwick
  • West Wiltshire
  • Cannock Chase
  • East Staffs
  • Lichfield
  • Newcastle-under-Lyme
  • South Staffs
  • Stafford
  • Staffordshire Moorlands
  • Stoke on Trent
  • Tamworth

West Midlands CC

  • Coventry
  • Dudley C
  • Sandwell
  • Solihull
  • Walsall
  • Wolverhampton

Cheshire CC

  • Chester
  • Congleton
  • Crewe and Nantwich
  • Ellesmere Port
  • Halton
  • Macclesfield
  • Vale Royal
  • Warrington

Merseyside CC

  • Liverpool
  • St. Helen
  • Sefton
  • Wirral

Greater Manchester CC

  • Bolton
  • Bury
  • Manchester
  • Oldham
  • Rochdale C
  • Salford
  • 334
  • Stockport
  • Tameside C
  • Trafford

Humberside CC

  • Beverly
  • Boothferry
  • Cleethorpes
  • Grimsby
  • Holderness
  • Kingston-upon-Hull
  • Scunthorpe

South Yorks CC

  • Barnsley
  • Rotherham
  • Sheffield

West Yorks CC

  • Bradford
  • Calderdale
  • Kirklees C
  • Leeds C
  • Wakefield

North Yorks CC

  • Craven
  • Hambleton
  • Harrogate
  • Ryedale
  • Selby
  • Scarborough C
  • York C

Tyne and Wear CC

  • Newcastle upon Tyne
  • North Tyneside
  • South Tyneside
  • Sunderland

Durham CC

  • Chester-le-Street
  • Darlington
  • Derwentside
  • Durham
  • Sedgefield
  • Wear Valley

Cumbria CC

  • Allerdale
  • Carlisle
  • Copeland
  • Eden

Cleveland CC

  • Hartlepool
  • Langbaurgh
  • Middlesbrough
  • Stockton-on-Tees

Northumberland CC

  • Alnwick
  • Berwick-upon-Tweed
  • Blyth Valley
  • Castle Morpeth
  • Tynedale
  • Wansbeck

Nottinghamshire CC

  • Bassetlaw
  • Broxtowe
  • Gedling
  • Mansfield
  • Nottingham City
  • Rushcliffe

Northants CC

  • Corby
  • Daventry
  • East Northants
  • Kettering
  • Northampton
  • 335
  • South Northants
  • Wellingborough

Lincs CC

  • Boston
  • East Lindsey
  • Lincoln
  • North Kesteven
  • South Holland
  • South Kesteven
  • West Lindsey

Leics CC

  • Blaby
  • Charnwood
  • Harborough
  • Leicester City
  • Melton
  • North West Leics
  • Rutland

Derbyshire CC

  • Bolsover
  • Derby City
  • Erewash
  • High Peak
  • South Derbyshire
  • West Derbyshire

Beds CC

  • North Bedford
  • Luton
  • Mid Beds
  • South Beds C
  • Aylesbury Vale
  • Beaconsfield
  • Chiltern
  • Wycombe

Herts CC

  • Broxbourne
  • Dacorum
  • Hertsmere
  • North Herts
  • St. Albans
  • Welwyn Hatfield C

Cambs CC

  • Fenland
  • Huntingdon
  • South Cambs

Essex CC

  • Basildon
  • Braintree
  • Chelmsford
  • Colchester
  • Harlow
  • Southend-on-Sea
  • Tendring
  • Thurrock

Norfolk CC

  • Breckland
  • Norwich
  • South Norfolk

Suffolk C.C.

  • Babergh
  • Ipswich
  • Suffolk Coastal
  • Waveney

Oxfordshire C.C.

  • Cherwell
  • Oxford City
  • South Oxford
  • Vale of Whltehorse
  • West Oxford

Newbury C.C.

  • Slough
  • 336
  • Windsor and Maidenhead
  • Wokingham

Surrey C.C.

  • Elmbridge
  • Epsom and Ewell
  • Guildford
  • Runnymeade
  • Spelthorne
  • Surrey Heath
  • Tandridge
  • Waverley
  • Woking

E. Sussex C.C.

  • Brighton
  • Eastbourne
  • Hastings
  • Hove
  • Wealden

Hampshire C.C.

  • Basingstoke
  • Eastleigh
  • Fareham
  • Gosport
  • Hart
  • Havant
  • New Forest
  • Portsmouth
  • Rushmoor
  • Southampton
  • Test Valley
  • Winchester

Avon C.C.

  • Bath
  • Bristol
  • Kingswood
  • North Avon
  • Wansdyke
  • Forest of Dean
  • Gloucester
  • Stroud
  • Tewkesbury

Somerset C.C.

  • Mendip
  • Taunton Deane C.
  • W. Somerset
  • Yeovil

Devon C.C.

  • Exeter C.
  • N. Devon
  • Plymouth
  • Teignbridge
  • Tiverton
  • Torbay
  • Torridge
  • W. Devon

Cornwall C.C.

  • Penwith
  • Restormel

Dorset C.C.

  • Bournemouth
  • Christchurch
  • N. Dorset
  • Poole
  • Purbeck
  • Weymouth and Portland
  • Wimborne

Greater London Council

  • Barking
  • Barnet
  • Bexley
  • Brent
  • 337
  • Bromley
  • Camden
  • Corporation of London (City)
  • Croydon
  • Ealing
  • Enfield
  • Greenwich
  • Hackney
  • Hammersmith
  • Haringey
  • Harrow
  • Havering
  • Hillingdon
  • Hounslow
  • Islington
  • Kensington and Chelsea
  • Kingston-upon-Thames
  • Lambeth
  • Lewisham
  • Merton
  • Newham
  • Redbridge
  • Richmond-upon-Thames
  • Southwark
  • Sutton
  • Tower Hamlets
  • Waltham Forest
  • Wandsworth
  • Westminster

Lanes C.C.

  • Blackburn
  • Blackpool
  • Burnley
  • Chorley
  • Fylde
  • Hyndburn
  • Pendle
  • Preston
  • Ribble Valley
  • S Ribble
  • West Lanes
  • Wyre

Mr. Michael Latham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether, pursuant to the replies by the hon. Member for Greenwich (Mr. Barnett) on 15th February and 27th June, he will now indicate how many local authorities have failed to reduce their staffing and administration costs to 1976–77 levels in respect of the Community Land Scheme, contrary to paragraph 5 of GNLA /12; what special action he has taken to achieve compliance; and what monitoring activity he envisages to ensure his policy is carried out.

Mr. Guy Barnett

My Department's regional offices have been instructed to issue loan sanctions for these costs only where they are satisfied that they are reasonable in all the circumstances. In the light of recent experience I would expect the overall figures for 1977–78 to be of the same order as for last year.

Mr. Michael Latham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) how many of the 729.6 acres acquired by local authorities under the Community Land Act 1975 in 1976–77 for industry have subsequently been resold to developers, or let directly to clients; what are the total receipts by way of premium and rental income; and by how much the £5.4 million acquisition cost exceeds the receipts;

(2) how many of the 832.4 acres acquired by local authorities under the Community Land Act 1975 in 1976–77 have subsequently been resold to private developers; and by how much the £6.25 million acquisition cost exceeds the receipts.

(3) how many of the nine acres acquired by local authorities under the Community Land Act 1975 in 1976–77 for commercial purposes have subsequently been resold to private developers; or let directly to clients; what are the total receipts by way of premium and rental income; and by how much the £0.44 million acquisition cost exceeds the receipts.

Mr. Guy Barnett

Information on disposals in 1976–77 is as follows. Details of disposals in the current financial year are not yet available.

Acres disposed of
Housing 32.2
Industry 0.75
Commerce 1 property

Capital receipts so far obtained for the housing land total £295,000. Details of rents paid for the industrial and commercial land will be shown in land accounts for the current year.

Mr. Michael Latham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether, pursuant to the reply of the hon. Member for Greenwich (Mr. Barnett) on 7th July, he is now able to say how much of the £5 million benefit to local authorities of buying land net of development land tax in 1976–77 was accounted for by land bought under the Community Land Scheme.

Mr. Guy Barnett

Final figures are not yet available but are expected to show a benefit of the order of £2½ million to authorities in England.

Mr. Michael Latham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much land has been acquired by local authorities (a) for housing, (b) for commercial development and (c) for industrial development since the beginning of the current financial year; and what have been the acquisition costs in each case, and any income from re-sale.

Mr. Guy Barnett

It is too early to provide information about land acquired and disposed of by authorities during the current financial year.

Mr. Michael Latham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) whether, in view of the fact that only £12.25 million of the £24.4 million in loan sanctions granted in 1976–77 to local authorities for land acquisition under the Community Land Scheme was actually spent, he will indicate for each county council what amount of the unused proportion at the end of the 1976–77 financial year they have sought to claim again in the current financial year; and what approval he has given in each case;

(2) whether he will set out in tabular form for each county authority the loan sanction (a) issued, (b) spent and (c) unused in the period since 6th April 1977 for land acquisition under the Community Land Scheme, indicating in each case how much of the new allocation was represented either by the county council seeking to reclaim part of last year's unused sanctions, or by wholly new projects which were not presented to him last year.

Mr. Guy Barnett

The following table shows how much loan sanction has been issued so far this financial year to county areas for the purchase of land. It is too early to give figures for purchases made. No central record is kept of the number of wholly new projects.

County Area Land Sanction Issued (£)
Avon 6,500
Bedfordshire 1,994,000
Berkshire 248,500
Buckinghamshire 39,000
Cambridgeshire 21,500
Cheshire 13,500
Cumbria 144,500
Devon 18,500
Dorset 13,000
Durham 99,000
East Sussex 58,000
Essex 42,000
Greater London 3,022,000
Greater Manchester 518,000
Hampshire 216,000
Hereford & Worcestershire 75,500
Hertfordshire 100,000
Humberside 76,000
Isle of Wight 43,000
Kent 156,000
Lancashire 5,000
Lincolnshire 31,000
Merseyside 18,000
Norfolk 91,500
Northamptonshire 88,000
Northumberland 287,000
Oxfordshire 10,500
Shropshire 40,500
South Yorkshire 274,500
Staffordshire 224,000
Suffolk 47,500
Surrey 536,500
Tyne & Wear 71,500
Warwickshire 167,000
West Midlands 1,436,000
West Yorkshire 106,000

Mr. Michael Latham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether, pursuant to paragraph 7 of GNLA /14, he will indicate how many of the schemes of land acquisition under the Community Land Act 1975 have produced higher infrastructure costs than previously envisaged; what is the total extra sum sought in local sanction by local authorities to cover this gap; by how much it exceeds the total of previous sanctions; and how many local authorities are involved.

Mr. Guy Barnett

As GNLA 14 indicated, the impression was that this was a growing number. It was not however thought to be a large one, and I do not think that the time and resources involved in quantifying it more precisely would be justified.

Mr. Michael Latham

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will give, for each county council, the total number of acres acquired, indicating the intended use in each case, to date, under the Community Land Act 1975 how many have been subsequently resold or relet; and whether he will break down each figure for: (a) 1976–77 and (b) the current financial year.

Mr. Guy Barnett

The following tables give provisional figures of land acquired and disposed of during 1976–77 for each

Acres acquired (provisional)
County Area Housing Industry Commerce Total
Avon Nil 1 Nil 1
Bedfordshire 10 Nil Nil 10
Berkshire Nil 2 Nil 2
Cheshire Nil 17 Nil 17
Cleveland Nil 8 Nil 8
Cornwall Nil 6 Nil 6
Cumbria Nil 72 Nil 72
Derbyshire 41 Nil Nil 41
Devon Nil 16 1 17
Dorset 12 18 1 31
Durham 24 12 Nil 36
East Sussex 20 1 Nil 21
Greater London 5 9 Nil 14
Greater Manchester 11 30 Nil 41
Hampshire 28 2 Nil 30
Hereford and Worcestershire 10 11 Nil 21
Hertfordshire Nil Nil 1 1
Humberside 14 37 Nil 51
Kent 5 36 Nil 41
Lancashire 2 Nil Nil 2
Leicester Nil 51 Nil 51
Lincolnshire Nil 18 Nil 18
Merseyside 87 2 Nil 89
Norfolk 2 13 Nil 15
Northamptonshire 22 Nil Nil 22
Northumberland 74 10 Nil 84
North Yorkshire 5 Nil Nil 5
Nottingham 46 7 Nil 53
Oxfordshire 5 Nil Nil 5
Somerset 19 Nil Nil 19
South Yorkshire 85 148 Nil 233
Staffordshire 170 38 7 215
Surrey 8 Nil Nil 8
Tyne and Wear 30 92 Nil 122
Warwickshire Nil 5 Nil 5
West Midlands 103 33 0.1 136
West Yorkshire 10 42 Nil 52
Acres disposed of (provisional)
County Area Housing Industry Commerce Total
Greater Manchester Nil 0.75 Nil 0.75
Hampshire Nil Nil 1 property* 1 property*
South Yorkshire 9.4 Nil Nil 9.4
Surrey 1.3 Nil Nil 1.3
Northumberland 21.5 Nil Nil 21.5
* Too small to record area.

Forward to