HC Deb 15 December 1977 vol 941 cc392-4W
Mr. Molloy

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will arrange area health authorities in order of listing upon dividing the 1976–77 expenditure of each area health authority in England by the population figures for each area.

Mr. Moyle

The revenue expenditure per head of population by each area health authority in England in 1976–77, arranged in descending order, is as follows:

AREA HEALTH AUTHORITY—1976/77 REVENUE EXPENDITURE PER HEAD OF POPULATION
£
Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster (T) 212
Camden and Islington (T) 179
Liverpool (T) 168
Manchester (T) 166
Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham (T) 157
City and East London (T) 155
Newcastle on Tyne (T) 152
Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth (T) 136
Greenwich and Bexley 122
Birmingham (T) 116
Sheffield (T) 115
Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow (T) 114
Salford (T) 114
Avon (T) 113
Hillingdon 113
Redbridge and Waltham Forest 111
Kingston and Richmond 110
Brent and Harrow 108
Wakefield 103
Leeds (T) 101
Oxfordshire (T) 101
Somerset 97
Bromley 96
Devon 96
Northumberland 95
Croydon 94
East Sussex 94
Surrey 94
Barking and Havering 93
Cambridgeshire (T) 93
Lancashire 93
Isle of Wight 92
£
Kent 92
Barnet 90
Suffolk 90
Sunderland 90
Chehire 89
Hampshire (T) 89
Hereford and Worcester 89
Hertfordshire 89
North Yorkshire 89
Nottinghamshire (T) 87
Cumbria 86
Dorset 86
Enfield and Haringey 86
Bradford 85
Cleveland 85
Durham 84
Lincolnshire 84
Northamptonshire 84
West Sussex 84
Wirral 84
Berkshire 83
Coventry 83
Humberside 83
Kirklees 83
Salop 83
Sefton 83
Warwickshire 83
Cornwall 82
Buckinghamshire 81
Essex 81
Wiltshire 81
Wolverhampton 81
Norfolk 80
Calderdale 78
Gloucester 78
Derbyshire 76
Stockport 75
Bolton 73
Doncaster 73
Staffordshire 73
Leicestershire (T) 72
Bedfordshire 71
Gateshead 71
Rochdale 70
Dudley 69
Trafford 69
Barnsley 67
South Tyneside 67
Wigan 67
Oldham 66
Solihull 66
Bury 65
Walsall 65
Rotherham 61
North Tyneside 58
Thameside 57
Sandwell 55
St. Helens and Knowsley 55

NOTES

1. "T" denotes a teaching area health authority.

2. Expenditure figures are expressed in terms of the 1976 provisional mid-year estimates of resident populations; the figures are influenced by the payment of London Weighting allowance to staff and by the incidence of additional expenditure in the provision of facilities for the clinical teaching of medical and dental students.

3. The population figures used take no account of people who are provided with treatment outside their area of residence nor are they adjusted for differences in the morbidity and age/sex structure of area populations.