HC Deb 03 February 1976 vol 904 cc564-5W
Mr. Cryer

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will introduce legislation to require drivers of commercial road vehicles carrying toxic materials to carry packs containing antidotes, protection equipment and similar facilities for dealing with an emergency situation.

Dr. Gilbert

I understand from the Chairman of the Health and Safety Commission that the need for vehicles carrying toxic substances to have special equipment for use in an emergency will be taken into account when proposals for new regulations are prepared.

Mr. Cryer

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he is satisfied that the current legislation provides sufficient safeguards against the dangers arising out of the transport by road of toxic materials and liquids; and if he will make a statement.

Dr. Gilbert

The current controls under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1933 are not entirely satisfactory, and the Health and Safety Commission is now studying proposals for regulations for the conveyance of all hazardous substances including those of a toxic nature.

Mr. Cryer

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will introduce legislation to require toxic materials carried in road vehicles to be carried on designated routes consisting principally of motorways and trunk roads.

Dr. Gilbert

I have recently announced revised proposals for a national system of routes for heavy lorries, which will apply equally to those carrying toxic substances. At least initially, the national system will be advisory. It will be for local authorities to use their road traffic regulations powers to impose prohibitions on roads away from the network. I understand from the Chairman of the Health and Safety Commission that operators of vehicles carrying dangerous substances are already encouraged to consult the police on the choice of a suitable route.

Mr. Cryer

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will introduce legislation to require toxic materials which are being moved more than 50 miles to be carried by rail where reasonably convenient railheads exist.

Dr. Gilbert

Each case must be taken on its merits. While, therefore, I have reservations about adopting my hon. Friend's suggestion, the Government encourage industry to make the maximum use of rail, where there are no overriding safety considerations to the contrary and where it is desirable on economic, social or environmental grounds to do so.