HL Deb 28 May 1970 vol 310 cc1233-4WA
LORD INGLEWOOD

asked Her Majesty's Government:

To supply a list of the Members of the House of Lords who, if Commoners, would be disqualified under Section 1(1)(f) of the House of Commons Disqualification Act 1957 specifying— (a) the name of the Lord;

Section Offence Maximum Fine
1 and 6 Exceeding limit of muriatic acid, sulphuric acid etc. in emission from alkali work. £100 first offence, £100 or £20 per day (whichever is the greater) where an offence is substantially a repetition within 3 months of an earlier offence.
2 and 7 Failure to use best practical means for preventing emissions from alkali work.
3 Failure to separate acids etc. from waste.
4 Nuisance from alkali waste £20 first offence, £50 subsequent offence plus £5 per day for continuing offence.
5 Failure to comply with abatement notice. £20 plus £5 per day for continuing offence.
8 Contravention of order to prevent discharge of noxious or offensive gas in cement or smelting works. £100 first offence, £100 or £20 per day (whichever is the greater) where an offence is substantially a repetition within months of an earlier offence.
9 Failure to register alkali works
12 Obstructing alkali Inspector in execution of his duty. £10.
Any other offence £100 first offence, £100 or £20 per day (whichever is the greater) where an offence is substantially a repetition within 3 months of an offence.
The reference to the Rivers (Prevention of Pollution) Acts 1951 and 1960 in the table (Col, 551) should have been to the Rivers (Prevention of Pollution) Acts 1951 and 1961.

  1. (b) the office or place (whether whole or part-time);
  2. (c) the pay;
  3. (d) where applicable, the Minister who first appointed and who last confirmed the Peer in his office or place.

LORD SHACKLETON

I regret that this information is not available, although some of the information sought by the noble Lord may be obtained by comparing the House of Commons Disqualification Acts with the List of Members of Public Boards of a Commercial Character published annually as a Command Paper. To obtain the information in full would involve a disproportionate expenditure of time and money.