HC Deb 05 May 1924 vol 173 cc52-3W
Sir T. BRAMSDON

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty, if he will give a list of the ratings at Portsmouth who elected representatives for the Welfare Committee, 1924; the number of each of these ratings who were at the port and were eligible to attend the meetings arranged for the selection of the representatives; the number of representatives of each class who were elected and the number of each class who actually attended the meetings that elected the representatives; and if the present system of election is considered satisfactory?

Mr. AMMON

On the assumption that the elections for Port Class Request meet- ings at Portsmouth are referred to, and that "Classes" means branches of the

1. 2. 3. 4.
Seaman Yes 4,829 7 19
Signal Yes 260 2 5
Telegraphist Yes 460 2 60
Sailmaker Yes 7 1 2
Regulating Yes 74 1 7
Mechanician Yes 11 2 2
Stokers Yes 1,833 6 13
E.R.A.'s Yes 515 5 80
Royal Marines, including Divisional Band No 1,074 Nil Nil
Royal Marine Bands Yes 207 4 155
Electrical Artificers Yes 186 3 13
Ordnance Artificers Yes 100 2 6
Armourers Yes 64 2 1
Shipwrights Yes 174 4 19
Joiners Yes 39 1 2
Blacksmiths Yes 22 1 1
Plumbers Yes 22 1 1
Painters No 25 Nil Nil
Coopers No 13 Nil Nil
Writers Yes 211 2 24
Supply Yes 82 2 2
Cooks No 175 Nil Nil
Sick Berth Yes 241 5 37
Officers' Stewards Yes 366 3 9
Officers' Cooks Yes 109 3 3

With regard to the fifth part of the question the existing arrangements for these elections are considered to be the best which can be devised.