§ Lord Kennetasked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether their answer to his Question "whether international law would ever permit a pre-emptive attack on a target deemed to be 'a weapon of mass destruction'" (H.L. Deb, 28 February, col. WA62) indicates that they are in doubt about the lawfulness of pre-emptive attacks, and whether they will quote international legal instruments which would render such pre-emptive attacks lawful.
§ Baroness Chalker of WallaseyAs I indicated in my previous reply, whether the use of force is lawful in any 17WA particular situation will depend on the facts of the case. The primary instrument which governs this subject is the United Nations Charter.