HC Deb 24 November 1992 vol 214 cc556-7W
Mrs. Helen Jackson

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has had from local authorities affected by the announcement on 13 November that there would be no more new starts under the urban programme.

Mr. Robin Squire

My right hon. and learned Friend and other Ministers have received a few representations from local authorities about the arrangements set out in my letter of 13 November to urban programme authority leaders for an urban partnership fund, which will use uncommitted urban programme money alongside local authority capital receipts and other resources to promote urban regeneration.

Mrs. Helen Jackson

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (i) if he will list those authorities eligible for urban programme funding(a) that are also in receipt of successful city challenge project allocation, (b) that put forward city challenge projects which failed and (c) that did not bid for city challenge;

(2) if he will list the local authorities in England that received an allocation from the urban programme this year.

Mr. Robin Squire

Tables 1 and 2 list successful and unsuccessful city challenge authorities. Taken together, the tables list all 57 authorities which received an urban programme allocation in 1992–93.

Table 1—successful city challenge authorities
Barnsley Manchester
Birmingham Middlesbrough
Blackburn Newcastle
Bolton Newham
Bradford North Tyneside
Brent Nottingham
Derby Rotherham
Doncaster Sandwell
Hackney Sefton
Hartlepool Stockton-on-Tees
Kensington and Chelsea Sunderland
Kirklees Tower Hamlets
Lambeth Walsall
Leicester Wigan
Lewisham Wirral
Liverpool Wolverhampton
Table 2—unsuccessful city challenge authorities
Bristol Leeds
Burnley Oldham
Coventry Plymouth
Dudley Preston
Gateshead Rochdale
Greenwich Salford
Halton Sheffield
Hammersmith and Fulham South Tyneside
Haringey Southwark
Hull St. Helens
Islington Wandsworth
Knowsley The Wrekin
Langbaurgh

Mrs. Helen Jackson

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his present estimate of urban programme allocation for 1992–93, 1993–94 and 1994–95 (a) nationally, (b) for each region and (c) by urban programme authority.

Mr. Robin Squire

(a) The public expenditure provision of the urban programme is £237 million in 1992–93, £176 million in 1993–94 and £91 million 1994–95. This will allow us to fund existing commitments in future years and provide an additional £20 million in 1993–94 for projects as part of capital partnership.

(b) The 1992–93 provision includes the urban crime fund initiative. The main urban programme provision for each region for 1992–93 is set out in the table.

£ million
Northern 36.520
North West 38.954
Merseyside 28.285
West Midlands 35.488
East Midlands 9.913
Yorkshire and Humberside 25.997
London 43.172
South West 2.665

In addition, local authorities contribute 25 per cent. of the cost of revenue projects, estimated at about £16 million, and will receive £11 million for projects supported by district health authorities from the Department of Health. Regional allocations for future years have not yet been made.

(c) For initial allocations to urban programme authorities for 1992–93, I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Newham, North-West (Mr. Banks) on 5 June, Official Report, column 666.