§ Mr. Dobsonasked the Secretary of State for Social Services, further to his answer to the hon. Member for Holborn and St. Pancras on 9 December, whether Arthur Andersen and Co. submitted the lowest tender for each of the contracts referred to.
§ Mr. Newton[pursuant to his reply, 12 December 1986, c. 289]: Wessex regional health authority did not compare costs for each separate sub-system, because its declared objective was a single integrated system. Some of the combinations proposed were not capable of satisfying the identified requirements. On a cost basis, Arthur Andersen and Co. were equal lowest at the end of the evaluation process but best value for money overall.
§ Mr. Dobsonasked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list all those who advised Wessex health authority on any aspect of the prospective contracts before tenders were invited; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. Newton[pursuant to his reply, 12 December 1986, c. 290]: Between October 1984 and October 1985 Wessex regional health authority was advised by
- Deloittes, Haskins and Sells
- Model Systems
- PACTEL
- F International.