HL Deb 23 June 1904 vol 136 c966

House in Committee (according to order).

THE DUKE OF NORTHUMBERLAND

moved to leave out the Preamble of the Bill, which he explained had got in by mistake.

Moved, "To leave out the Preamble."—(The Duke of Northumberland.)

On Question, Preamble omitted.

Bill re-committed to the Standing Committee; and to be printed as amended. (No. 117.)

THE MARQUESS OF RIPON

I should like to ask the noble Marquess what are the intentions of His Majesty's Government with regard to this Bill. I am not opposed to the Bill personally. We understood that it was to be allowed to be read a second time, but was to go no further. It has now passed through Committee. I do not object, but it seems to me to be inconsistent with the statement made by the Foreign Secretary when the Bill was read a second time, and I should like, therefore, to have some information as to what is the intention of the Government with regard to the future course of the Bill.

THE MARQUESS OF LANSDOWNE

My statement the other evening had no reference to the passage of the Bill through your Lordships' House. I expressed the opinion, to which I adhere, that the Bill stands no chance whatever of becoming law during the present session of Parliament. That was what I ventured to indicate.

THE DUKE OF NORTHUMBERLAND

I certainly understood what has just been stated by the noble Marquess, that this Bill could not become law this session; but I did not understand that I was not to proceed with any further stage in this House.