§ Report from, That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the following Bills ought to be dispensed with and the Bills allowed to proceed:—
§ Mexborough and Swinton Tramways [H.L.].
§ Newcastle upon Tyne Corporation Tramways [H.L.],
§ South Shields, Sunderland, and District Tramways [H.L.].
§ That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the
§ London County Council (Tramways and Improvements) Bill
§ ought to be dispensed with, provided the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 6A, 6B, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13 be struck out of the Bill.
§ That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the
§ Hastings Tramways Bill [H.L.]
§ ought to be dispensed with, and the Bill allowed to proceed, provided all powers for the construction of the proposed extension Tramway be struck out of the Bill.
522§ That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the
§ Birmingham and Midland Tramways Bill [H.L.]
§ ought to be dispensed with, and the Bill allowed to proceed, provided all powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 7, 7A, 8, 9, 9A, and 9P, be struck out of the Bill, unless the consent of the Oldbury Urban District be proved before the Committee on the Bill.
§ That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the
§ Exeter and District Tramways Bill [H.L.]
§ ought to be dispensed with, and the Bill allowed to proceed, provided the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10, and so much of Tramways Nos. 2 and 3 as lie within the boundaries of the City of Exeter, be struck out of the Bill.
§ That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the
§ Croydon and District Electric Tramways Bill
§ ought to be dispensed with, and the Bill allowed to proceed, provided the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 23, and 24, be struck out of the Bill.
§ That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the
§ London and Brighton Electric Railway Bill [H.L.]
§ ought not to be dispensed with.
§ Read, and agreed to.