§ 1. Mr. Juddasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will make a statement on the request for visas for visiting students from North Vietnam.
§ 20. Mr. Will Griffithsasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department why he refused to allow three Vietnamese students to stay in London, for the purpose of accepting an invitation extended to them by a London student organisation.
§ 26. Mr. Macdonaldasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will state his reasons for refusing entrance to this country to the three Vietnamese students who hoped to speak at a recent meeting at the London School of Economics.
§ The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Mr. Roy Jenkins)I have nothing to add to the speech made by my hon. Friend the Joint Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State on 23rd October. —[Vol. 751, cols. 1430–44.]
§ Mr. JuddCan my right hon. Friend assure me that the letters sent to me on 3rd and 27th July do not represent a categorical decision of principle against such visits? In what circumstances can such visits take place?
§ Mr. JenkinsI cannot answer hypothetical questions. They were in line with the policy which we have pursued for a number of years, but, of course, all 1858 relevant considerations are always taken into account.
§ Mr. GriffithsCan we take it that the Home Secretary is saying that no one invited to visit this country from Vietnam to explain the position of North Vietnam will be allowed into the country for that purpose?
§ Mr. JenkinsI was asked why we did not allow these students to come in, and this matter was very fully and, I thought, very admirably explained by my hon. Friend earlier in the week.
§ Mr. MacdonaldDoes the decision in principle not to allow students from Vietnam to come in override the expression of opinion that all sides of this debate should be heard?
§ Mr. JenkinsI think that all sides of this debate are heard. I must say that my hon. Friend is on a false point when he gives particular weight and status to these individuals as students. They were fairly advanced in age for students. While, clearly, there is room for different points of view on this issue, their alleged status as students was not a new factor in the situation.
§ Mr. MolloyIn matters of this context, is my right hon. Friend's responsibility merely administrative with the policy made by the Foreign Office? Can that be cleared up?
§ Mr. JenkinsFor so long as I am Home Secretary, any Ministerial decision announced by the Home Office will be something for which I shall take full responsibility. At the same time, as is only sensible, we take into account wider considerations, including foreign policy.