HC Deb 10 November 1921 vol 148 cc610-1
66. Mr. ATKEY

asked the Home Secretary how many prosecutions have taken place in Staffordshire in respect of alleged offences by motor manufacturers and dealers against the registration Regulations affecting general identification marks, and how many of the same have been dismissed; and whether the activity of the Staffordshire police in this respect arises from the instructions of his Department?

Mr. SHORTT

I am informed by the Chief Constable that 104 prosecutions have been ordered (83 by the county council as registration authority and 21 by the Chief Constable). Fourteen have been dismissed. The answer to the last part of the question is in the negative.

Mr. ATKEY

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that these prosecutions have been mainly directed against responsible firms, and why is this cumbrous method adopted to enforce Regulations of this kind?

Mr. SHORTT

I understand that all those who have been prosecuted have broken the law, and that is the reason why they were proceeded against.

Mr. ATKEY

Are we to understand that this system which is being adopted in Staffordshire is going to be carried out throughout the country?

Viscount CURZON

Why is it necessary to take such action in the case of Staffordshire and no other county?

Mr. SHORTT

I must ask for notice of that question.

Viscount CURZON

I asked you that the other day.

Sir W. JOYNSON-HICKS

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that representations have been made on this matter to the Ministry of Transport, and has he received notice of those representations; or would he be prepared to receive a deputation himself on the matter?

Mr. SHORTT

I do not know about the Ministry of Transport, but if anyone wishes to see me I shall be pleased to see them.

Mr. ATKEY

Does the right hon. Gentleman realise that every one of these prosecutions costs these firms something like and is that reasonable in view of the fact that a man can jump on his wife for £1?