HC Deb 26 March 1913 vol 50 cc1725-49

This Act may be cited as the Consolidated Fund (No. 1) Act, 1913.

Mr. JAMES HOPE

I beg to move, after the word "Fund," to insert the words "and borrowing."

I desire to add these words in order to better describe the purposes of the Bill. Attention should be drawn to the fact that this Bill gives very large borrowing powers to the Government.

Mr. PETO

On a point of Order. Does this Amendment precede mine?

The CHAIRMAN

The Amendment precedes the one the hon. Member for Devizes (Mr. Peto) has handed in.

Mr. JAMES HOPE

The fact that the Act confers large borrowing powers on the Government does not appear from the title. Anybody reading the title without taking the trouble to read the Clauses would not realise that the Bill gives borrowing powers to the extent of over £41,000,000 to the Government. I think the title with my Amendment better explains the purposes of the Bill.

The PRIME MINISTER

I must congratulate the hon. Member on having discovered what I believe no one has hitherto discovered, namely, a relevant Amendment and one which is in order to the third or descriptive Clause of the Consolidated Fund Bill. That fact reflects the greatest credit on the Parliamentary ingenuity of the hon. Member. I say that quite unaffectedly as an old hand in these matters, and I congratulate him that he should have hit upon this happy discovery. But to look at it for a moment seriously, the hon. Gentleman, I am sure, will agree with me that it is an unnecessary Amendment. Every Consolidated Fund Bill ever passed, certainly within my memory, has contained borrowing powers. It contains a borrowing Clause which is absolutely essential if the Grant which is made in the first Clause and the power to issue Treasury Bills is not to be a nugatory power. The Treasury must have power to anticipate the Grant by issuing Treasury Bills for a short period. That is not a new feature in this Bill, but a common feature of all Consolidated Fund Bills, for which this title has always been held to be sufficient and appropriate. The hon. Gentleman's only point was the magnitude of the amount. If that is really the objection, it is not an objection to the borrowing powers; it is an objection to the first Clause and to the Grant on so large a scale. Your borrowing powers must be commensurate with your issuing powers. If you raise an objection to the magnitude of the amount, and not in any way to the borrowing power, it is really illogical, because the borrowing Clause only follows the issuing Clause and one is the necessary consequence and concomitant of the other. Both on the ground of precedent and of the special circumstances of the case, I suggest to the hon. Member that he should not proceed further with the Amendment.

Sir F. BANBURY

I join the right hon. Gentleman in congratulating my hon. Friend on the ingenuity which he has shown, not for the first time, in this House. The right hon. Gentleman has based his objection upon the fact that it is contrary to all precedent, and that hitherto the title of all Consolidated Fund Bills has been the same. I should like to say that what he has said is quite correct. I am a stickler for precedent; the right hon. Gentleman is not, for there is hardly any precedent he has not broken in the last seven years, from the Constitution down to the guillotine.

The PRIME MINISTER

All the more reason why I should not break another.

Sir F. BANBURY

There is joy over one sinner that repenteth. The right hon. Gentleman has almost moved me to sit down and say nothing more, for he stands in a white sheet of repentance in face of the Committee, and I hope of the country, but this is more serious than the right hon. Gentleman has said. The precedent he has cited does not clearly indicate to the ordinary observer what is in the Bill. The title of the Bill under the old precedent does not compare with the Bill as it is. I remember Sir Charles Dilke once saying in this House, when a question of precedent was raised as an argument against not accepting an Amendment, that he did not know there had been so many bad precedents. That argument might have been advanced by my hon. Friend. What the Amendment proposes to do is to indicate clearly what is the effect of the Consolidated Fund Bill. Unless the words are put in, people might think that the effect of the Consolidated Fund Bill is to apply the sum authorised out of the Consolidated Fund for the 31st March. It is not only that, it authorises borrowing in order to get money into the Consolidated Fund. The ordinary interpretation of the Bill would be that the money was in the Consolidated Fund as the produce of taxes, but it really gives a special power providing that the money should be obtained by borrowing. I think the right hon. Gentleman will agree that if in matters of finance we find bad precedents, it is best to do away with them. It will be better for all who are to succeed us in this House that they should see that on this day the House of Commons decided to put in words clearly indicating what is in the Bill. For these reasons I support the Amendment.

Mr. SANDYS

After your observations, Sir, a little earlier in the afternoon as to the exceptional course which this Debate has taken, I confess to a certain amount of diffidence in addressing the Committee with regard to the Amendment so ably brought forward by my hon. Friend.

Sir F. BANBURY

My hon. Friend need not be alarmed, for on 28th March, 1905, right hon. and hon. Gentlemen opposite had eleven Divisions on this stage of the Bill. We have not done as much as that.

7.0 P.M.

Mr. SANDYS

I am glad to learn from my hon. Friend that hon. Members who now sit on the other side of the House took a keener interest in these financial questions than they do now, when their Friends are sitting on the Treasury Bench. As I was observing when I was interrupted, I am not going to detain the Committee because I know that the House and the country generally are awaiting eagerly the statement which the First Lord of the Admiralty is to make at a considerably later hour this evening. I understand that the importance which might have attached to that speech has been somewhat minimised by the intelligent anticipations which we believe are already in the hands of the proper authorities. The congratulations which the Prime Minister addressed to the Mover of the Amendment were very well deserved. The speech of the Prime Minister on this Amendment was even more unsatisfactory than the speech he made earlier in the afternoon in reply to an Amendment moved by the hon. Baronet (Sir F. Banbury). He seemed in the first part of his speech to throw some doubt upon the seriousness with which my hon. Friend advanced this Amendment. It was more in the tone of what he said than the actual words he used. Personally, I have not the slightest doubt that my hon. Friend brought forward this Amendment in order to improve the Bill. I do not attach very great value to the statement made by the right hon. Gentleman that the Bill has a similar title to that which has always been given to these Bills in order that ancient forms and precedents might be followed. As has been pointed out, the right hon. Gentleman has really no just cause for following a precedent of this kind, for there is no one in the Committee who has more consistently ignored precedents or any of the forms of our institutions. Therefore I am somewhat surprised to find the right hon. Gentleman, on the second occasion this afternoon, saying that ancient forms and customs must always be followed. The object of the Amendment was to give that clearness and distinctness to the title of the Bill which we have a right to demand in every Bill framed by the Government. Any person casually reading the Bill would see that the title was to apply a sum out of the Consolidated Fund to the service of the year ending 31st March, 1914, and he might suppose that there were no borrowing powers conferred upon the Government in the Bill itself; but, of course, when we come to examine it more closely we find that this £41,027,000, which is to be issued out of the Consolidated Fund, is dealt with in the first Clause, whereas the second Clause gives power to the Treasury to borrow.

The CHAIRMAN

The hon. Member cannot now deal with Clauses 1 and 2. We are now on Clause 3.

Mr. SANDYS

My only object was to show that the title as it stands does not adequately describe these two Clauses, and that it would be clearer if the Amendment was adopted. We have often urged that proper attention is not given to these financial matters. I think we are also entitled to urge that these Finance Bills, dealing with these enormous sums, which eventually come out of the pockets of the unfortunate taxpayer, should be worded in such a manner that an ordinarily intelligent elector when he examines the Acts of Parliament and glances through the titles of the measures which a beneficent Government has passed, should be able by the mere examination of the titles to see what the object is.

The CHAIRMAN

The hon. Member, I am afraid, is putting before the Committee the identical argument which was put before it by the hon. Member (Mr. Hope), and if he refers to Standing Order 19 he will see that he is not entitled to repeat the arguments of those who preceded him.

Mr. SANDYS

The object of everyone is to bring this Debate to a conclusion when the subject has been adequately discussed, though I see no reason why these important questions should be hurried through and passed without proper examination. I am very sorry if, in my anxiety lest any of these points should not be adequately dealt with, I have trespassed on the grounds which has been so well covered by my hon. Friend, who has preceded me. I will therefore address myself to other points in connection with the matter. It would be not only for the general convenience of the electorate, who take a far greater interest in these matters than hon. Members opposite appear to imagine, and I think the way in which the Closure has been applied to these financial discussions—

The CHAIRMAN

The hon. Member must not criticise the action of the Chair in accepting the Motion or the decision of the House.

Mr. SANDYS

I certainly had not the slightest intention of criticising the action of the Chair. What I desired to criticise was the action of the Minister in bringing to a conclusion a very proper debate.

The CHAIRMAN

That is the same thing. It is the action of the House. The Government can only move it.

Mr. SANDYS

I do not wish to deal with the point any further. I accept not only your ruling, but the ruling of the House, though I think it is regrettable that the decision of the House should have been taken on this particular occasion. I think the Amendment requires very careful consideration. Until far more weighty arguments are brought forward against the Amendment than those which were advanced by the Prime Minister, I shall certainly feel it my duty to follow my hon. Friend into the Lobby.

Mr. RONALD M'NEILL

When I first heard this Amendment I felt some doubt whether I should not be reluctantly compelled to support the Government. Of course I am a loyal party man, and I endeavoured to find grounds which would enable me to vote for the Amendment. We are all anxious to hear the statement of the First Lord of the Admiralty, and it will be very unfortunate indeed if such an important announcement as we are likely to hear should be known to the Reichstag before it is known to the House of Commons. For that reason I am sure the House feel that the right hon. Gentleman has taken a proper course if, as we understand, he has taken steps to prevent publicity being given to it prematurely. I did not think it was a very serious matter at first whether we had the words "and borrowing" or not, but I have been entirely converted by the speeches I have heard. The Prime Minister, in asking the House to reject this Amendment, said it had been proposed upon the ground that the borrowing powers were excessive, and he brought forward in reply to that the argument that that was an objection, not to Clause 3, but to the first Clause, and that the borrowing powers in the Bill must necessarily correspond with the issue. That sounds perfectly reasonable, but we unsuccessfully objected to the amount of money which the Government are taking in this Bill, and as we cannot limit that amount, surely it is reasonable to bring the title of the Bill into conformity with the action of the Government in taking an excessive sum, and surely it is reasonable that when a much larger sum than necessary is being taken due notice should be taken of that. If the Government really think there is no serious objection to these words being added it would be perfectly simple for them to say that, notwithstanding any precedent there may be, they are willing to accept it. Surely the strenuous manner in which the Government are resisting the Amendment is sufficient proof that they do at all events regard it quite as seriously as we do, though they appear to take an opposite view as regards its propriety. I agree with the Prime Minister that precedent is in favour of the Clause standing as it is at present. I have taken steps to find out how far that precedent goes back, and I believe it goes back as far as William Pitt. But the whole method of national finance, and the control of this House, was quite different in those days. If you go back some generations you come to a system of finance which the present Chancellor of the Exchequer would probably call a feudal method.

The CHAIRMAN

That is a great deal too wide for a Clause only containing the title of the Bill.

Mr. RONALD M'NEILL

I was only attempting to deal with the argument of the Prime Minister that the form of this Clause is supported by long precedent, and while admitting that that is so I think the reply to it is that the whole system of Government in these days rests upon a very much more democratic basis than in the time when these precedents were made, and it is much more important that in these days we should keep a correct correspondence between what these Finance Acts are doing and the titles of those Acts. It is very important that the people who ought to have control of the finance of the country and who have very much less than they used to have through the House of Commons should have every facility given them in looking through the Statute Book and finding out with as little trouble and research as possible exactly what it is that is done by the Government when they are asking for money from the taxpayers. For that reason, although I do not think it really is a matter of supreme importance I think it is of sufficient importance to justify us in bringing it before the House, and I also think the Prime Minister might go further and satisfy us in this respect, and save the time of the House, and not put us to the trouble of a Division, by accepting the Amendment.

Mr. JAMES HOPE

I believe it is a mark of a cold and suspicious nature to be unmoved by flattery. I was so much

moved by the kind and generous words of the Prime Minister that, if the Question had been put then, I would not have pressed the Amendment to a Division, but on reflection, I feel that I must steel myself in order that the title of this Bill may be some real index of its contents, and therefore, against my own better judgment, I feel it is necessary to press the Amendment to a Division.

Question put, "That those words be there inserted."

The Committee divided: Ayes, 159; Noes, 268.

Division No. 13.] AYES. [7.15 p.m.
Agg-Gardner, James Tynte Gibbs, George Abraham M'Calmont, Major Robert C. A.
Anstruther-Gray, Major William Gilmour, Captain John Middlemore, John Throgmorton
Baird, John Lawrence Glazebrook, Captain Philip K. Mills, Hon. Charles Thomas
Baker, Sir Randolf L. (Dorset, N.) Goldman, C. S. Morrison-Bell, Capt. E. F. (Ashburton)
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Goldsmith, Frank Mount, William Arthur
Barnston, Harry Gordon, Hon. John Edward (Brighton) Newdegate, F. A.
Beach, Hon. Michael Hugh Hicks Goulding, Edward Alfred Nicholson, William G. (Petersfield)
Benn, Arthur Shirley Grant, J. A. O'Neill, Hon. A. E. B. (Antrim, Mid)
Bentinck, Lord H. Cavendish- Greene, Walter Raymond Paget, Almeric Hugh
Beresford, Lord Charles Gretton, John Pease, Herbert Pike (Darlington)
Bigland, Alfred Guinness, Hon. Rupert (Essex, S.E.) Peel, Lieut.-Colonel R. F.
Bird, Alfred Guinness, Hon. W. E. (Bury S. Edmunds) Perkins, Walter F.
Blair, Reginald Gwynne, R. S. (Sussex, Eastbourne) Peto, Basli Edward
Boscawen, Sir Arthur S. T. Griffith- Haddock, George Bahr Pole-Carew, Sir R.
Boyle, William (Norfolk, Mid) Hall, D. B. (Isle of Wight) Pollock, Ernest Murray
Bridgeman, William Clive Hall, Frederick (Dulwich) Pretyman, Ernest George
Bull, Sir William James Hambro, Angus Valdemar Quilter, Sir William Eley C.
Burgoyne, Alan Hughes Hamersley, Alfred St. George Randles, Sir John S.
Burn, Colonel C. R. Hardy, Rt. Hon. Laurence Rawlinson, John Frederick Peel
Campbell, Captain Duncan F. (Ayr, N.) Harris, Henry Percy Rees, Sir J. D.
Campbell, Rt. Hon. J. (Dublin Univ.) Harrison-Broadley, H. B. Remnant, James Farquharson
Campion, W. R. Helmsley, Viscount Roberts, S. (Sheffield, Ecclesall)
Carlile, Sir Edward Hildred Henderson, Major H. (Berkshire) Rolleston, Sir John
Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edward H. Hewins, William Albert Samuel Samuel, Sir Harry (Norwood)
Cassel, Felix Hibbert, Sir Henry F. Sanders, Robert Arthur
Cecil, Evelyn (Aston Manor) Hickman, Colonel Thomas E. Scott, Sir S. (Marylebone, W.)
Cecil, Lord Hugh (Oxford Univ.) Hill, Sir Clement L. Stanier, Beville
Cecil, Lord R. (Herts, Hitchin) Hill-Wood, Samuel Starkey, John Ralph
Chaloner, Colonel R. G. W. Hoare, S. J. G. Staveley-Hill, Henry
Clay, Captain H. H. Spender Hohler, Gerald Fitzroy Steel-Maitland, A. D.
Clive, Captain Percy Archer Hope, Harry (Bute) Stewart, Gershom
Coates, Major Sir Edward Feetham Hope, James Fitzalan (Sheffield) Sykes, Alan John (Ches., Knutsford)
Collings, Rt. Hon. J. (Birmingham) Hope, Major J. A. (Midlothian) Sykes, Mark (Hull, Central)
Cooper, Richard Ashmole Horne, E. (Surrey, Guildford) Talbot, Lord E.
Courthope, George Loyd Horner, Andrew Long Terrell, G. (Wilts., N. W.)
Craig, Charles Curtis (Antrim, S.) Houston, Robert Paterson Thomson, W. Mitchell- (Down, North)
Craig, Captain James (Down, E.) Hunt, Rowland Tobin, Alfred Aspinall
Craig, Norman (Kent, Thanet) Hunter, Sir Charles Rodk. Valentia, Viscount
Craik, Sir Henry Ingleby, Holcombe Walker, Col. William Hall
Crichton-Stuart, Lord Ninian Kebty-Fletcher, J. R. Weston, Colonel J, W.
Cripps, Sir Charles Alfred Kerr-Smiley, Peter Kerr Wheler, Granville C. H.
Croft, H. P. Kerry, Earl of White, Major G. D. (Lancs., Southport)
Dalziel, Davison (Brixton) Kinloch-Cooke, Sir Clement Williams, Col. R. (Dorset, W.)
Dickson, Rt. Hon. C. Scott Knight, Captain Eric Ayshford Willoughby, Major Hon. Claud
Eyres-Monsell, Bolton M. Lane-Fox, G. R. Wills, Sir Gilbert
Faber, George Denison (Clapham) Law, Rt. Hon. A. Bonar (Bootle) Wolmer, Viscount
Falle, Bertram Godfray Lee, Arthur Hamilton Wood, John (Stalybridge)
Fell, Arthur Locker-Lampson, G. (Salisbury) Worthington-Evans, L.
Fisher, Rt. Hon. W. Hayes Locker-Lampson, O. (Ramsey) Wright, Henry Fitzherbert
Fitzroy, Hon. Edward A. Lockwood, Rt. Hon. Lt.-Colonel A. R. Yate, Colonel C. E.
Flannery, Sir J. Fortescue Long, Rt. Hon. Walter Younger, Sir George
Fletcher, John Samuel (Hampstead) Lonsdale, Sir John Brownlee
Forster, Henry William MacCaw, Wm. J. MacGeagh TELLERS FOR THE AYES.—Mr.
Gastrell, Major W. Houghton Mackinder, Halford J. Sandys and Mr. Ronald M'Neill.
NOES.
Abraham, William (Dublin, Harbour) Ainsworth, John Stirling Arnold, Sydney
Acland, Francis Dyke Alden, Percy Asquith, Rt. Hon. Herbert Henry
Addison, Dr. C. Allen, Arthur A. (Dumbartonshire) Baker, H. T. (Accrington)
Baker, Joseph A. (Finsbury, E.) Harvey, T. E. (Leeds, West) Nuttall, Harry
Balfour, Sir Robert (Lanark) Harvey, W. E. (Derbyshire, N.E.) O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny)
Baring, Sir Godfrey (Barnstaple) Haslam, Lewis (Monmouth) O'Connor, John (Kildare, N.)
Barlow, Sir John Emmott (Somerset) Havelock-Allan, Sir Henry O'Connor, T. P. (Liverpool)
Barnes, G. N. Hayden, John Patrick O'Doherty, Philip
Barton, William Hayward, Evan O'Donnell, Thomas
Beale, Sir William Phipson Hazleton, Richard O'Dowd, John
Beauchamp, Sir Edward Hemmerde, Edward George O'Grady, James
Beck, Arthur Cecil Henderson, Arthur (Durham) O'Kelly, James (Roscommon, N.)
Bentham, G. J. Henderson, J. M. (Aberdeen, W.) O'Malley, William
Boland, John Pius Henry, Sir Charles O'Neill, Dr. Charles (Armagh, S.)
Booth, Frederick Handel Herbert, General Sir Ivor (Mon., S.) O'Shaughnessy, P. J.
Bowerman, C. W. Higham, John Sharp O'Shee, James John
Boyle, Daniel (Mayo, North) Hinds, John O'Sullivan, Timothy
Brace, William Hodge, John Outhwaite, R. L.
Brady, Patrick Joseph Hogge, James Myles Palmer, Godfrey Mark
Brunner, John F. L. Holmes, Daniel Turner Parker, James (Halifax)
Bryce, J. Annan Holt, Richard Durning Parry, Thomas H.
Burke, E. Haviland- Horne, Charles Silvester (Ipswich) Pearce, William (Limehouse)
Burns, Rt. Hon. John Howard, Hon. Geoffrey Pease, Rt. Hon. Joseph A. (Rotherham)
Burt, Rt Hon. Thomas Hudson, Walter Phillips, John (Longford, S.)
Buxton, Noel (Norfolk, North) Hughes, S. L. Pointer, Joseph
Byles, Sir William Pollard Illingworth, Percy H. Ponsonby, Arthur A. W. H.
Carr-Gomm, H. W. Isaacs, Rt. Hon. Sir Rufus Price, C. E. (Edinburgh, Central)
Cawley, Harold T. (Lancs., Heywood) Jardine, Sir J. (Roxburgh) Price, Sir Robert J. (Norfolk, E.)
Chancellor, Henry George John, Edward Thomas Pringle, William M. R.
Chapple, Dr. William Allen Jones, Edgar (Merthyr Tydvil) Radford, G. H.
Churchill, Rt. Hon. Winston S. Jones, H. Haydn (Merioneth) Rea, Walter Russell (Scarborough)
Clancy, John Joseph Jones, J. Towyn (Carmarthen, East) Reddy, M.
Clough, William Jones, Leif Stratten (Notts, Rushcliffe) Redmond, John E. (Waterford)
Clynes, John R. Jones, W. S. Glyn- (Stepney) Redmond, William (Clare, E.)
Compton-Rickett, Rt. Hon. Sir J. Jowett, F. W. Redmond, William Archer (Tyrone, E.)
Condon, Thomas Joseph Keating, Matthew Rendall, Athelstan
Cornwall, Sir Edwin A. Kelly, Edward Richardson, Thomas (Whitehaven)
Cotton, William Francis Kennedy, Vincent Paul Roberts, Charles H. (Lincoln)
Crawshay-Williams, Eliot Kilbride, Denis Robertson, Sir G. Scott (Bradford)
Crean, Eugene King, J. Robertson, J. M. (Tyneside)
Crooks, William Lambert, Rt. Hon. G. (Devon, S. Molton) Robinson, Sidney
Crumley, Patrick Lambert, Richard (Wilts, Cricklade) Roch, Walter F. (Pembroke)
Dalziel, Rt. Hon. Sir J. H. (Kirkcaldy) Law, Hugh A, (Donegal, W.) Roche, Augustine (Louth)
Davies, David (Montgomery Co.) Leach, Charles Roe, Sir Thomas
Davies, Ellis William (Eifion) Levy, Sir Maurice Rose, Sir Charles Day
Davies, Timothy (Lincs., Louth) Lough, Rt. Hon. Thomas Rowlands, James
Dawes, J A. Lundon, Thomas Rowntree, Arnold
Delany, William Lyell, Charles Henry Runciman, Rt. Hon. Walter
Denman, Hon. Richard Douglas Lynch, A. A. Russell, Rt. Hon. Thomas W.
Dickinson, W. H. Macdonald, J. M. (Falkirk Burghs) Samuel, J. (Stockton-on-Tees)
Dillon, John McGhee, Richard Scanlan, Thomas
Donelan, Captain A. Macnamara, Rt. Hon. Dr. T. J. Scott, A. MacCallum (Glas., Bridgeton)
Doris, William MacNeill, J. G. Swift (Donegal, South) Seely, Rt. Hon. Colonel J. E. B.
Duffy, William J. Macpherson, James Ian Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Duncan, C. (Barrow-in-Furness) MacVeagh, Jeremiah Sheehy, David
Duncan, J. Hastings (Yorks, Otiey) M'Callum, Sir John M. Sherwell, Arthur James
Edwards, Clement (Glamorgan, E.) McKenna, Rt. Hon. Reginald Simon, Rt. Hon. Sir John Allsebrook
Elverston, Sir Harold M'Laren, Hon. H. D. (Leics.) Smith, Albert (Lancs., Clitheroe)
Esmonde, Dr. John (Tipperary, N.) M'Laren, Hon. F.W.S. (Lines., Spalding) Smyth, Thomas F. (Leitrim)
Falconer, James M'Micking, Major Gilbert Snowden, Philip
Farrell, James Patrick Manfield, Harry Soames, Arthur Wellesley
Fenwick, Rt. Hon. Charles Marks, Sir George Croydon Sutherland, J. E.
Ferens, Rt. Hon. Thomas Robinson Mason, David M. (Coventry) Sutton, John E.
Ffrench, Peter Masterman, Rt. Hon. C. F. G. Taylor, John W. (Durham)
Field, William Meagher, Michael Taylor, Theodore C. (Radcliffe)
Fiennes, Hon. Eustace Edward Meehan, Francis E. (Leitrim, N.) Taylor, Thomas (Bolton)
Fitzgibbon, John Middlebrook, William Tennant, Harold John
Flavin, Michael Joseph Millar, James Duncan Thomas, James Henry
France, Gerald Ash burner Molloy, Michael Thorne, G. R. (Wolverhampton)
Gilhooly, James Molteno, Percy Alport Toulmin, Sir George
Ginnell, Laurence Money, L. G. Chiozza Trevelyan, Charles Philips
Gladstone, W. G C. Montagu, Hon. E. S. Verney, Sir Harry
Glanville, H. J. Mooney, John J. Wadsworth, J.
Goddard, Sir Daniel Ford Morgan, George Hay Walsh, Stephen (Lancs., Ince)
Goldstone, Frank Morrell, Philip Walton, Sir Joseph
Greenwood, Granville G. (Peterborough) Morison, Hector Ward, John (Stoke-upon-Trent)
Grey, Rt. Hon. Sir Edward Morton, Alpheus Cleophas Wardle, George J.
Griffith, Ellis J. Muldoon, John Waring, Walter
Guest, Major Hon. C. H. C. (Pembroke) Munro, R. Wason, Rt. Hon. E. (Clackmannan)
Guest, Hon. Frederick E. (Dorset, E.) Munro-Ferguson, Rt. Hon. R. C. Wason, John Cathcart (Orkney)
Gulland, John William Murphy, Martin J. Watt, Henry Anderson
Gwynn, Stephen Lucius (Galway) Murray, Captain Hon. Arthur C. Webb, H.
Hackett, John Needham, Christopher T. White, J. Dundas (Glas., Tradeston)
Hancock, J. G. Neilson, Francis White, Sir Luke (Yorks, E.R.)
Harcourt, Robert V. (Montrose) Norman, Sir Henry White, Patrick (Meath, North)
Hardie, J. Keir Norton, Captain Cecil W. Whitehouse, John Howard
Harmsworth, Cecil (Luton, Beds.) Nugent, Sir Walter Richard Whittaker, Rt. Hon. Sir Thomas P.
Whyte, A. F. (Perth) Wing, Thomas
Wilkie, Alexander Wood, Rt. Hon. T. McKinnon (Glas.) TELLERS FOR THE NOES.—Mr.
Wilson, John (Durham, Mid) Young, W. (Perthshire, E.) Wedgwood Benn and Mr. W. Jones.
Wilson, W. T. (Westhoughton)
The CHAIRMAN

The Amendment handed in by the hon. Member for Devizes (Mr. Peto), to leave out "(No. 1)" is not one I can accept. It seems to me to be trifling with the Committee to propose to leave out "No. 1," because it would be of no effect. It will make no difference whether these words are in or not.

Mr. JAMES HOPE

I also handed in this Amendment, and I submit that it is relevant, because, by having "No. 1" in the Bill there is an implication that there is going to be a No. 2 Bill. No one can say that there will be a No. 2 Bill, and if we say in this case No. 1, people in future will be misled, because there may not be a No. 2 Bill at all. I submit that, in order to get rid of this difficulty, the Amendment is really a serious one.

Mr. PETO

If it is in accordance with precedent to call this Bill No. 1, I would point out that it is not in accordance with what takes place in respect of other Bills passed through the House. Take the case

of the Railway Bill last Session. In that case the Government would have been perfectly wrong in calling the first Railway Bill No. 1, because neither they nor anybody else had any idea that they would have to withdraw that Bill and introduce No. 2 Bill. I submit that this is not only a serious Amendment, but that it will make a great deal of difference, because, by putting No. 1 in the title of this Bill, people will be led to suppose that, as a matter of course, whether they like it or not, we are to have a succession of such Bills before arriving at the Appropriation Bill. I submit that this is a serious Amendment, and one that ought to be accepted by the Committee.

The CHAIRMAN

I am afraid the hon. Member has not convinced me.

Question put, "That the Clause stand part of the Bill."

The Committee divided: Ayes, 271; Noes, 152.

Division No. 14.] AYES. [7.28 p.m.
Abraham, William (Dublin, Harbour) Condon, Thomas Joseph Goldstone, Frank
Acland, Francis Dyke Cornwall, Sir Edwin A. Greenwood, Granville G. (Peterborough)
Adamson, William Cotton, William Francis Grey, Rt. Hon. Sir Edward
Addison, Dr. C. Crawshay-Williams, Eliot Griffith, Ellis J.
Ainsworth, John Stirling Crean, Eugene Guest, Hon. Major C. H. C. (Pembroke)
Alden, Percy Crooks, William Guest, Hon. Frederick E. (Dorset, E.)
Allen, Arthur A. (Dumbartonshire) Crumley, Patrick Gulland, John William
Arnold, Sydney Dalziel, Rt. Hon. Sir J. H. (Kirkcaldy) Gwynn, Stephen Lucius (Galway)
Asquith, Rt. Hon. Herbert Henry Davies, David (Montgomery Co.) Hackett, J.
Baker, H. T. (Accrington) Davies, Ellis William (Eifion) Hancock, J. G.
Baker, Joseph A. (Finsbury, E.) Davies, Timothy (Lincs., Louth) Harcourt, Robert V. (Montrose)
Balfour, Sir Robert (Lanark) Davies, Sir W. Howell (Bristol, S.) Hardie, J. Keir
Baring, Sir Godfrey (Barnstaple) Dawes, J. A. Harmsworth, Cecil (Luton, Beds.)
Barlow, Sir John Emmott (Somerset) Delany, William Harvey, T. E. (Leeds, West)
Barnes, G. N. Denman, Hon. Richard Douglas Harvey, W. E. (Derbyshire, N.E.)
Barton, William Dickinson, W. H. Haslam, Lewis (Monmouth)
Beale, Sir William Phipson Dillon, John Havelock-Allan, Sir Henry
Beauchamp, Sir Edward Donelan, Captain A. Hayden, John Patrick
Beck, Arthur Cecil Doris, William Hayward, Evan
Bentham, G. J. Duffy, William J. Hazleton, Richard
Boland, John Pius Duncan, C. (Barrow-in-Furness) Hemmerde, Edward George
Booth, Frederick Handel Duncan, J. Hastings (Yorks, Otley) Henderson, Arthur (Durham)
Bowerman, C. W. Edwards, Clement (Glamorgan, E.) Henderson, J. M. (Aberdeen, W.)
Boyle, Daniel (Mayo, North) Elverston, Sir Harold Henry, Sir Charles
Brace, William Esmonde, Dr. John (Tipperary, N.) Herbert, General Sir Ivor (Mon., S.)
Brady, Patrick Joseph Falconer, James Higham, John Sharp
Brunner, John F. L. Farrell, James Patrick Hinds, John
Bryce, J. Annan Fenwick, Rt. Hon. Charles Hodge, John
Burke, E. Haviland- Ferens, Rt. Hon. Thomas Robinson Hogge, James Myles
Burns, Rt. Hon. John Ffrench, Peter Holmes, Daniel Turner
Burt, Rt. Hon. Thomas Field, William Holt, Richard Durning
Buxton, Noel (Norfolk, North) Fiennes, Hon. Eustace Edward Horne, Charles Silvester (Ipswich)
Byles, Sir William Pollard Fitzgibbon, John Howard, Hon. Geoffrey
Carr-Gomm, H. W. Flavin, Michael Joseph Hudson, Walter
Cawley, Harold T. (Lancs., Heywood) France, Gerald Ashburner Hughes, Spencer Leigh
Chancellor, H. G. George, Rt. Hon. D. Lloyd Illingworth, Percy H.
Chapple, Dr. William Allen Gilhooly, James Isaacs, Rt. Hon. Sir Rufus
Clancy, John Joseph Ginnell, Laurence Jardine, Sir J. (Roxburgh)
Clough, William Gladstone, W. G. C. John, Edward Thomas
Clynes, John R. Glanville, H. J. Jones, Edgar (Merthyr Tydvil)
Compton-Rickett, Rt. Hon. Sir J. Goddard, Sir Daniel Ford Jones, H. Haydn (Merioneth)
Jones, J. Towyn (Carmarthen, East) Murray, Captain Hon. Arthur C. Runciman, Rt. Hon. Walter
Jones, Leif Stratten (Notts, Rushcliffe) Needham, Christopher T. Russell, Rt. Hon. Thomas W.
Jones, W. S. Glyn- (Stepney) Neilson, Francis Samuel, J. (Stockton-on-Tees)
Jowett, F. W. Norman, Sir Henry Scanlan, Thomas
Keating, Matthew Norton, Captain Cecil W. Scott, A. MacCallum (Glas., Bridgeton)
Kelly, Edward Nugent, Sir Walter Richard Seely, Colonel Rt. Hon. J. E. B.
Kennedy, Vincent Paul Nuttall, Harry Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Kilbride, Denis O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny) Sheehy, David
King, J. O'Connor, John (Kildare, N.) Sherwell, Arthur James
Lambert, Rt. Hon. G. (Devon, S. Molton) O'Connor, T. P. (Liverpool) Simon, Rt. Hon. Sir John Allsebrook
Lambert, Richard (Wilts, Cricklade) O'Doherty, Philip Smith, Albert (Lancs., Clitheroe)
Law, Hugh A. (Donegal, W.) O'Donnell, Thomas Smyth, Thomas F. (Leitrim)
Leach, Charles O'Dowd, John Snowden, Philip
Levy, Sir Maurice O'Grady, James Soames, Arthur Wellesley
Lough, Rt. Hon. Thomas O'Kelly, James (Roscommon, N.) Stanley, Albert (Staffs, N.W.)
Lundon, Thomas O'Malley, William Sutherland, J. E.
Lyell, Charles Henry O'Neill, Dr. Charles (Armagh, S.) Sutton, John E.
Lynch, A. A. O'Shaughnessy, P. J. Taylor, John W. (Durham)
Macdonald, J. M. (Falkirk Burghs) O'Shee, James John Taylor, Theodore C. (Radcliffe)
McGhee, Richard O'Sullivan, Timothy Taylor, Thomas (Bolton)
Macnamara, Rt. Hon. Dr. T. J. Outhwaite, R. L. Tennant, Harold John
MacNeill, J. G. Swift (Donegal, South) Palmer, Godfrey Mark Thomas, James Henry
Macpherson, James Ian Parker, James (Halifax) Thorne, G. R. (Wolverhampton)
MacVeagh, Jeremiah Parry, Thomas H. Toulmin, Sir George
M'Callum, Sir John M. Pearce, William (Limehouse) Trevelyan, Charles Philips
McKenna, Rt. Hon. Reginald Pease, Rt. Hon. Joseph A. (Rotherham) Wadsworth, J.
M'Laren, Hon. H. D. (Leics.) Phillips, John (Longford, S.) Walsh, Stephen (Lancs., Ince)
M'Laren, Hon. F.W.S. (Lincs., Spalding) Pointer, Joseph Walton, Sir Joseph
M'Micking, Major Gilbert Ponsonby, Arthur A. W. H. Ward, John (Stoke-upon-Trent)
Manfield, Harry Price, C. E. (Edinburgh, Central) Wardle, George J.
Marks, Sir George Croydon Price, Sir R. J. (Norfolk, E.) Waring, Walter
Mason, David M. (Coventry) Pringle, William M. R. Wason, Rt. Hon. E. (Clackmannan)
Masterman, Rt. Hon. C. F. G. Radford, G. H. Wason, John Cathcart (Orkney)
Meagher, Michael Rea, Walter Russell (Scarborough) Watt, Henry Anderson
Meehan, Francis E. (Leitrim, N.) Reddy, M. Webb, H.
Middlebrook, William Redmond, John E. (Waterford) White, J. Dundas (Glas., Tradeston)
Millar, James Duncan Redmond, William (Clare, E.) White, Sir Luke (Yorks, E.R.)
Molloy, Michael Redmond, William Archer (Tyrone, E.) White, Patrick (Meath, North)
Molteno, Percy Alport Rendall, Athelstan Whitehouse, John Howard
Money, L. G. Chlozza Richardson, Thomas (Whitehaven) Whittaker, Rt. Hon. Sir Thomas P.
Montagu, Hon. E. S. Roberts, Charles H. (Lincoln) Whyte, A. F. (Perth)
Mooney, John J. Robertson, Sir G. Scott (Bradford) Wilkie, Alexander
Morgan, George Hay Robertson, J. M. (Tyneside) Wilson, John (Durham, Mid)
Morrell, Philip Robinson, Sidney Wilson, W. T. (Westhoughton)
Morison, Hector Roch, Walter F. (Pembroke) Wing, Thomas
Morton, Alpheus Cleophas Roche, Augustine (Louth) Wood, Rt. Hon. T. McKinnon (Glas.)
Muldoon, John Roe, Sir Thomas Young, W. (Perthshire, E.)
Munro, R. Rose, Sir Charles Day
Munro-Ferguson, Rt. Hon. R. C. Rowlands, James TELLERS FOR THE AYES.—Mr.
Murphy, Martin J. Rowntree, Arnold Wedgwood Benn and Mr. W. Jones.
NOES.
Agg-Gardner, James Tynte Courthope, George Loyd Gwynne, R. S. (Sussex, Eastbourne)
Anstruther-Gray, Major William Craig, Charles Curtis (Antrim, S.) Haddock, George Bahr
Baker, Sir Randolf L. (Dorset, N.) Craig, Captain James (Down, E.) Hall, D. B. (Isle of Wight)
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Craig, Norman (Kent, Thanet) Hall, Frederick (Dulwich)
Barnston, Harry Crichton-Stuart, Lord Ninian Hambro, Angus Valdemar
Beach, Hon. Michael Hugh Hicks Cripps, Sir Charles Alfred Hamersley, Alfred St. George
Benn, Arthur Shirley (Plymouth) Croft, H. P. Harris, Henry Percy
Bentinck, Lord H. Cavendish- Dalziel, Davison (Brixton) Harrison-Broadley, H. B.
Beresford, Lord Charles Dickson, Rt. Hon. C. Scott Helmsley, Viscount
Bigland, Alfred Eyres-Monsell, Bolton M. Henderson, Major H. (Berkshire)
Bird, Alfred Faber, George Denison (Clapham) Hewins, William Albert Samuel
Blair, Reginald Falle, Bertram Godfray Hibbert, Sir Henry F.
Boscawen, Sir Arthur S. T. Griffith- Fell, Arthur Hickman, Colonel Thomas E.
Boyle, William (Norfolk, Mid) Fisher, Rt. Hon. W. Hayes Hill, Sir Clement L.
Bridgeman, W. Clive Fitzroy, Hon. Edward A. Hill-Wood, Samuel
Burgoyne, Alan Hughes Flannery, Sir J. Fortescue Hoare, S. J. G.
Burn, Colonel C. R. Fletcher, John Samuel (Hampstead) Hohler, Gerald Fitzroy
Campbell, Captain Duncan F. (Ayr, N.) Forster, Henry William Hope, Harry (Bute)
Campbell, Rt. Hon. J. (Dublin Univ.) Gastrell, Major W. Houghton Hope, James Fitzalan (Sheffield)
Campion, W. R. Gibbs, George Abraham Horne, E. (Surrey, Guildford)
Carlile, Sir Edward Hildred Gilmour, Captain John Horner, Andrew Long
Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edward H. Glazebrook, Captain Philip K. Houston, Robert Paterson
Cassel, Felix Goldman, C. S. Hunt, Rowland
Cecil, Evelyn (Aston Manor) Goldsmith, Frank Hunter, Sir Charles Rodk.
Cecil, Lord Hugh (Oxford Univ.) Gordon, Hon. John Edward (Brighton) Ingleby, Holcombe
Chaloner, Colonel R. G. W. Goulding, Edward Alfred Kebty-Fletcher, J. R.
Clay, Captain H. H. Spender Grant, J. A. Kerr-Smiley, Peter Kerr
Clive, Captain Percy Archer Greene, Walter Raymond Kinloch-Cooke, Sir Clement
Coates, Major Sir Edward Feetham Gretton, John Knight, Captain Eric Ayshford
Coilings, Rt. Hon. J. (Birmingham) Guinness, Hon. Rupert (Essex, S.E.) Lane-Fox, G. R.
Cooper, Richard Ashmole Guinness, Hon. W.E. (Bury S. Edmunds) Law, Rt. Hon. Bonar (Bootle)
Lee, Arthur Hamilton Pole-Carew, Sir R. Sykes, Mark (Hull, Central)
Locker-Lampson, G. (Salisbury) Pollock, Ernest Murray Talbot, Lord E.
Locker-Lampson, O. (Ramsey) Pretyman, Ernest George Terrell, G. (Wilts, N.W.)
Lockwood, Rt. Hon. Lt.-Colonel A. R. Quilter, Sir William Eley C. Thomson, W. Mitchell- (Down, North)
Long, Rt. Hon. Walter Randles, Sir John S. Tobin, Alfred Aspinall
Lonsdale, Sir John Brownlee Rawlinson, John Frederick Peel Valentia, Viscount
MacCaw, Wm. J. MacGeagh Rees, Sir J. D. Walker, Col. William Hall
Mackinder, Halford J. Remnant, James Farquharson Weston, Colonel J. W.
M'Calmont, Major Robert C. A. Roberts, S. (Sheffield, Ecclesall) Wheler, Granville C. H.
M'Neill, Ronald (Kent, St. Augustine's) Rolleston, Sir John Williams, Col. R. (Dorset, W.)
Middlemore, John Throgmorton Rutherford, Watson (L'pool, W. Derby) Willoughby, Major Hon. Claud
Morrison-Bell, Capt. E. F. (Ashburton) Samuel, Sir Harry (Norwood) Wills, Sir Gilbert
Mount, William Arthur Sanders, Robert Arthur Wolmer, Viscount
Newdegate, F. A. Sandys, G. J. Wood, John (Stalybridge)
Nicholson, William G. (Petersfield) Scott, Sir S. (Marylebone, W.) Wright, Henry Fitzherbert
O'Neill, Hon. A. E. B. (Antrim, Mid) Stanier, Beville Yate, Colonel C. E.
Paget, Almeric Hugh Starkey, John Ralph Younger, Sir George
Pease, Herbert Pike (Darlington) Staveley-Hill, Henry
Peel, Lieut.-Colonel R. F. Steel-Maitland, A. D. TELLERS FOR THE NOES.—Sir H.
Perkins, Walter F. Stewart, Gershom Craik and Major White.
Peto, Basil Edward Sykes, Alan John (Ches., Knutsford)
The CHAIRMAN

In reference to a proposed new Clause which has been handed in by the hon. Baronet the Member for the City of London, I am not quite sure if I understand its purport, and perhaps he will allow me to say what I think it is. I understand that it is to prevent the Public Accounts and Charges Act applying in respect of the Supply which is contained in this Bill. That is to say, that none of the money provided by this Bill will be applicable, for instance, to the Navy Votes, which presumably will be carried on Friday and in the House on Monday?

Sir F. BANBURY

Yes.

The CHAIRMAN

I wish to guard myself, not having had time to refer to the precedents in this matter; but, having a doubt in my mind, I will allow the hon. Baronet to propose this Clause.

Sir F. BANBURY

I beg to propose that the following New Clause be read a second time:— Limitation of Application of Act. No sums issued under this Act shall be applied towards making good any Supply granted to His Majesty after the passing of this Act. As you have said, the effect of that is that any Supply which is granted after the passing of this Act cannot be used for the purpose of defraying any expense which may arise from services which have been entered into by the Government. This point was raised with very great warmth and some show of reason by the then Opposition in 1905. Then it was the Army; now it is the Navy. They pointed out that to take money which we have voted for the Army and apply it to the Navy is really practically to evade the rule which has always guided this House. It may be said that the Report stage of the Navy Vote will be taken on Monday, and that, therefore, all that my Amendment would do would be to prevent this Bill passing or being acted upon until the Report stage—that is to say, the Royal Assent could not be given until the Report stage of the Navy Bill

The PRIME MINISTER

That is not the effect of the Amendment.

The CHAIRMAN

If that is the case I would—

Sir F. BANBURY

That is not the effect of my Amendment. I say it might be held that that is the effect, but that is not so. I was anticipating the argument which would be brought forward by the right hon. Gentleman.

The PRIME MINISTER

Never in this world.

Sir F. BANBURY

I am glad to hear that. I will now proceed to the only other argument which can be brought forward against the Amendment by the right hon. Gentleman—that is, that if it is carried ft will necessitate another Consolidated Fund Bill in a very short time. It has already been said in this House to-day that the Committee ought to keep control of the finance of the country in its own hands. I do not want to go into the reasons which have actuated this procedure, but if for any reason it has been necessary to push matters forward in the hurried way in which they have been pushed forward, then it is the duty of the Government of the day to see that the rules of procedure which have governed the finances of the country for centuries shall be observed and to bring in another Consolidated Fund Bill. In those circumstances, I beg to move the Clause.

The PRIME MINISTER

I had the pleasure of congratulating the hon. Gentleman (Mr. James Hope), whom I do not see any longer in his place, on the skill which characterised the last Amendment. But I cannot congratulate the hon. Baronet on the Clause which he now proposes—indeed, it is with sorrow that I find him making himself responsible for such a Clause as this. What is the effect of this Clause, apart from the hypothetically expected conjectures to which he referred which might be advanced by some person — I thought it was himself — and which would be the construction of some not very skilful person? The effect of this Clause is simply this, that not a penny of this £41,000,000 can be expended upon the Navy. Although the House to-night, to-morrow, and on Monday will sanction the granting of certain Votes for payment of the Navy, those Votes cannot be got out of the Exchequer until we have gone through all the formalities of First Reading, Resolution in Ways and Means, Report of Resolution, Second Reading, Committee, and Third Reading of another Consolidated Fund Bill. That is what the hon. Baronet proposes. His argument is that he is keeping control by the House of Commons over the finance of the country. He is doing nothing of the kind. Not a penny of this money which is authorised by the Bill now before the House can be expended upon the Navy until the House has voted it in Committee in the first place, and sanctioned the expenditure, and until the Resolution is voted in Committee and reported to the House and approved upon Report. Therefore the House retains the most absolute control as to whether or not, and to what extent, any of the money, the issue of which is authorised by this Bill, shall be expended. No one knows better than the hon. Baronet that it would be a farce going again through the whole of these proceedings for several days on a new Consolidated Fund Bill, and that it would leave the Navy for a week, at any rate, without any lawful means of having one single penny spent upon it. That is the utmost expedition with which the Bill could be got through, and for a week it would be impossible to legally spend one halfpenny on the service of the Navy. That is the effect of the Amendmen. [HON. MEMBERS: "No, no."] That is the effect, and you cannot get out of it. The legality of this practice was very much called in question in 1905. The Government of that day, for reasons which were then stated, and which at any rate satisfied the public, contended that it was legal. But that is not the question. We are following strictly the precedents, and the hon. Baronet is now trying, by an affirmative provision in the Bill, to make it illegal to spend the money.

Sir F. BANBURY

I am trying to make it illegal to spend the money on the Navy without you pass another Consolidated Fund Bill.

The PRIME MINISTER

The hon. Baronet is trying to make it illegal to spend one penny of the money granted under this Bill on the Navy. We are following now the practice which has been followed since 1891, and it has not been attended by any inconvenience or abuse. This proposal would deprive an important service of the nation for an appreciable time of the necessary expenditure, and would do this for the first time by a private Amendment introduced into the Consolidated Fund Bill.

Sir F. BANBURY

The only effect would be to necessitate another Consolidated Fund Bill, which might take a week, though I do not know that it would. But that is not our fault; it is the fault of the right hon. Gentleman in trying to bring forward too many Bills in one Session, and prolonging the Session to such an extent that he could not call the House together at the proper time.

The PRIME MINISTER

That, again, is only the point which was taken in 1905 in regard to the Army; in this case it is the Navy. But no proposal was made at that time to introduce a Clause of this kind. Doubts were expressed as to the legality of the proceeding and as to whether we could, in these circumstances, lawfully issue on the part of the Crown money for such a purpose. No attempt was made to introduce any such Clause as this, and if there was, I am quite prepared to say that it was a mistake, and a mistake which ought not to be repeated. Let me point out that the hon. Baronet, on account of what he thinks our misdealing, is punishing the Navy by necessitating another Consolidated Fund Bill; in other words, this is the first time it is proposed to introduce a Clause of this kind into the Bill. We are following the normal operation of what has been the practice since 1891, and it is not possible for us to accept the Amendment.

Mr. BONAR LAW

The right hon. Gentleman, I think, has made a very convincing statement of the case, but he must have overlooked a similar proposal made on a former occasion by the First Lord of the Admiralty. On that occasion it is quite true that the right hon. Gentleman was not able to bring it to a discussion in this House for the simple reason that the Chairman held it was not in order, and he was not allowed to move it.

The CHAIRMAN

Perhaps I may say that I have some faint recollection of that, but I have not been able to find the record of it, and therefore I guarded myself on this occasion by saying that this was not to be taken as a precedent.

Mr. BONAR LAW

The Committee will understand that his proposal was in a different form, and I think the right hon. Gentleman will find that the effect of his proposal was the same, and therefore the right hon. Gentleman, who afterwards became responsible for the Navy, was himself guilty of all these crimes of which the right hon. Gentleman now speaks. The right hon. Gentleman now thinks it is quite a sufficient case when he points out that there is not time to get a second Consolidated Bill through. That is the attitude now. But what was his attitude in 1905? He turned to the Government of that day saying, "you make the excuse that the service will be starved, but whose fault is it? It is yours," and the right hon. Gentleman was then supported by the then Opposition in the very course which he deprecates to-day.

The PRIME MINISTER

That is not my recollection, nor is it that of my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary.

Mr. BONAR LAW

The right hon. Gentleman can disprove, if he can, that it is so, but I think I am right in what I am saying. There seems to be a fate in these things, and ill-doing, which is no very grave fault in the eyes of the right hon. Gentleman when sanctioned by his own side, is apt to have its revenge. What happened previously was this: A right hon. Gentleman was inconvenienced, as the First Lord of the Admiralty is to-day, by what happened.

Mr. CHURCHILL

No.

Mr. BONAR LAW

Well, the House was inconvenienced by not having had the advantage of hearing the right hon. Gentleman's statement.

Mr. CHURCHILL

I have had the privilege of listening to a very interesting and amusing Debate.

Mr. BONAR LAW

The right hon. Gentleman has, I think, found it rather disquieting to listen to these discussions when very much more important matters were in his mind. The point I wish to remind him of is that he was the ringleader in 1905 of the very great obstruction which took place on that occasion. I do not deny that there has been obstruction on this occasion, but what has been the cause of it? It was not only begun by the other side, but a very undesirable precedent was set which was continued by the right hon. Gentleman a member of the Privy Council, who occupies an important position on that Bench. I say that the right hon. Gentleman on the occasion in 1905 was the ringleader, and eleven Divisions were taken on the same stage on which these discussions have taken place to-day.

Question, "that the Clause be read a second time," put, and negatived.

Motion made and Question put, "That the Chairman do report the Bill, without Amendment, to the House."

The Committee divided: Ayes, 264; Noes, 131.

Division No. 15.] AYES. [7.56 p.m.
Abraham, William (Dublin, Harbour) Benn, W. W. (T. H'mts., St. George) Cawley, H. T. (Lancs., Heywood)
Acland, Francis Dyke Bentham, G. J. Chancellor, Henry George
Adamson, William Boland, John Pius Chapple, Dr. William Allen
Addison, Dr. C. Booth, Frederick Handel Churchill, Rt. Hon. Winston S.
Alden, Percy Bowerman, C. W. Clancy, John Joseph
Allen, Arthur A. (Dumbarton) Boyle, Daniel (Mayo, North) Clough, William
Arnold, Sydney Brace, William Clynes, John R.
Baker, Joseph Allen (Finsbury, E.) Brady, Patrick Joseph Compton-Rickett, Rt. Hon. Sir J.
Balfour, Sir Robert (Lanark) Brunner, John F. L. Condon, Thomas Joseph
Baring, Sir Godfrey (Barnstaple) Bryce, J. Annan Cornwall, Sir Edwin A.
Barlow, Sir John Emmott (Somerset) Burke, E. Haviland- Cotton, William Francis
Barnes, G. N. Burns, Rt. Hon. John Crawshay-Williams, Eliot
Barton, William Burt, Rt. Hon. Thomas Crean, Eugene
Beale, Sir William Phipson Buxton, Noel (Norfolk, North) Crooks, William
Beauchamp, Sir Edward Byles, Sir William Pollard Crumley, Patrick
Beck, Arthur Cecil Carr-Gomm, H. W. Dalziel, Rt. Hon. Sir J. H. (Kirkcaldy)
Davies, David (Montgomery Co.) Jones, J. Towyn (Carmarthen, East) Pease, Rt. Hon. Joseph A. (Rotherham)
Davies, Ellis William (Elfion) Jones, Leif Stratten (Rushcliffe) Phillips, John (Longford, S.)
Davies, Timothy (Lincs., Louth) Jones, W. (Carnarvon) Pointer, Joseph
Davies, Sir W. Howell (Bristol, S.) Jones, W. S. Glyn- (Stepney) Ponsonby, Arthur A. W. H.
Dawes, J. A. Jowett, F. W. Price, C. E. (Edinburgh, Central)
Delany, William Keating, Matthew Price, Sir R. J. (Norfolk, E.)
Denman, Hon. Richard Douglas Kelly, Edward Pringle, William M. R.
Dewar, Sir J. A. Kennedy, Vincent Paul Radford, G. H.
Dickinson, W. H. Kilbride, Denis Rea, Walter Russell (Scarborough)
Dillon, John King, J. Reddy, Michael
Donelan, Captain A. Lambert, Rt. Hon. G. (Devon, S. Molton) Redmond, John E. (Waterford)
Doris, William Lambert, Richard (Wilts, Cricklade) Redmond, William (Clare, E.)
Duffy, William J. Law, Hugh A. (Donegal, West) Redmond, William Archer (Tyrone, E.)
Duncan, C. (Barrow-in-Furness) Leach, Charles Rendall, Athelstan
Duncan, J. Hastings (Yorks, Otley) Levy, Sir Maurice Richardson, Thomas (Whitehaven)
Edwards, Clement (Glamorgan, E.) Lough, Rt. Hon. Thomas Roberts, Charles H. (Lincoln)
Elverston, Sir Harold Lundon, Thomas Robertson, Sir G. Scott (Bradford)
Esmonde, Dr. John (Tipperary, N.) Lyell, Charles Henry Robertson, J. M. (Tyneside)
Falconer, James Lynch, A. A. Robinson, Sidney
Farrell, James Patrick Macdonald J. M. (Falkirk Burghs) Roch, Walter F. (Pembroke)
Fenwick, Rt. Hon. Charles McGhee, Richard Roche, Augustine (Louth)
Ferens, Rt. Hon. Thomas Robinson Macnamara, Rt. Hon. Dr. T. J. Roe, Sir Thomas
Ffrench, Peter MacNeill, J. G. Swift (Donegal, South) Rose, Sir Charles Day
Field, William Macpherson, James Ian Rowlands, James
Fiennes, Hon. Eustace Edward MacVeagh, Jeremiah Rowntree, Arnold
Fitzgibbon, John M'Callum, Sir John M. Russell, Rt. Hon. Thomas W.
Flavin, Michael Joseph McKenna, Rt. Hon. Reginald Samuel, J. (Stockton-on-Tees)
France, Gerald Ashburner M'Laren, Hon. H. D. (Leics.) Scanlan, Thomas
George, Rt. Hon. D. Lloyd M'Laren, Hon. F. W. S. (Lincs., Spalding) Scott, A. MacCallum (Glas., Bridgeton)
Gilhooly, James Manfield, Harry Seely, Col. Rt. Hon. J. E. B.
Ginnell, Laurence Marks, Sir George Croydon Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Gladstone, W. G. C. Mason, David M. (Coventry) Sheehy, David
Glanville, H. J. Masterman, Rt. Hon. C. F. G. Sherwell, Arthur James
Goddard, Sir Daniel Ford Meagher, Michael Simon, Rt. Hon. Sir John Allsebrook
Goldstone, Frank Meehan, Francis E. (Leitrim, N.) Smith, Albert (Lancs., Clitheroe)
Greenwood, Granville G. (Peterborough) Middlebrook, William Smyth, Thomas F. (Leitrim)
Grey, Rt. Hon. Sir Edward Millar, James Duncan Snowden, Philip
Griffith, Ellis J. Molloy, Michael Stanley, Albert (Staffs., N.W.)
Guest, Hon. Major C. H. C. (Pembroke) Molteno, Percy Alport Sutherland, J. E.
Gulland, John William Money, L. G. Chiozza Sutton, John E.
Gwynn, Stephen (Galway) Montagu, Hon. E. S. Taylor, John W. (Durham)
Hackett, John Mooney, John J. Taylor, Theodore C. (Radcliffe)
Hancock, J. G. Morgan, George Hay Taylor, Thomas (Bolton)
Harcourt, Robert V. (Montrose) Morrell, Philip Tennant, Harold John
Hardle, J. Keir Morison, Hector Thomas, James Henry
Harmsworth, Cecil (Luton, Beds) Morton, Alpheus Cleophas Thorne, G. R. (Wolverhampton)
Harvey, T. E. (Leeds, West) Muldoon, John Toulmin, Sir George
Harvey, W. E. (Derbyshire, N.E.) Munro, R. Trevelyan, Charles Philips
Haslam, Lewis (Monmouth) Murphy, Martin J. Ure, Rt. Hon. Alexander
Havelock-Allan, Sir Henry Murray, Captain Hon. Arthur C. Wadsworth, J.
Hayden, John Patrick Needham, Christopher T. Walsh, Stephen (Lancs., Ince)
Hayward, Evan Neilson, Francis Walton, Sir Joseph
Hazleton, Richard Norman, Sir Henry Ward, John (Stoke-upon-Trent)
Hemmerde, Edward George Norton, Captain Cecil W. Wardle, George J.
Henderson, Arthur (Durham) Nugent, Sir Walter Richard Waring, Walter
Henderson, J. M. (Aberdeen, W.) Nuttall, Harry Wason, Rt. Hon. E. (Clackmannan)
Henry, Sir Charles O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny) Watt, Henry Anderson
Herbert, General Sir Ivor (Mon., S.) O'Connor, John (Kildare, N.) Webb, H.
Higham, John Sharp O'Connor, T. P. (Liverpool) White, J. Dundas (Glas., Tradeston)
Hinds, John O'Doherty, Philip White, Sir Luke (Yorks, E.R.)
Hodge, John O'Donnell, Thomas White, Patrick (Meath, North)
Hogge, James Myles O'Grady, James Whitehouse, John Howard
Holmes, Daniel Turner O'Kelly, James (Roscommon, N.) Whittaker, Rt. Hon. Sir Thomas P.
Holt, Richard Durning O'Malley, William Whyte, A. F. (Perth)
Horne, Charles Silvester (Ipswich) O'Neill, Dr. Charles (Armagh, S.) Wilkie, Alexander
Hudson, Walter O'Shaughnessy, P. J. Wilson, John (Durham, Mid)
Hughes, S. L. O'Shee, James John Wilson, W. T. (Westhoughton)
Illingworth, Percy H. O'Sullivan, Timothy Wing, Thomas
Isaacs, Rt. Hon. Sir Rufus Outhwaite, R. L. Wood, Rt. Hon. T. McKinnon (Glas.)
Jardine, Sir J. (Roxburgh) Palmer, Godfrey Mark Young, W. (Perthshire, E.)
John, Edward Thomas Parker, James (Halifax)
Jones, Edgar (Merthyr Tydvil) Parry, Thomas H. TELLERS FOR THE AYES.—Mr.
Jones, H. Haydn (Merioneth) Pearce, William (Limehouse) G. Howard and Captain Guest.
NOES.
Agg-Gardner, James Tynte Bigland, Alfred Campbell, Rt. Hon. J. (Dublin Univ.)
Baird, John Lawrence Bird, Alfred Campion, W. R.
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Blair, Reginald Carlile, Sir Edward Hildred
Barnston, Harry Boscawen, Sir Arthur S. T. Griffith- Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edward H.
Beach, Hon. Michael Hugh Hicks Bridgeman, W. Clive Cassel, Felix
Benn, Arthur Shirley (Plymouth) Burgoyne, Alan Hughes Cecil, Evelyn (Aston Manor)
Bentinck, Lord H. Cavendish- Burn, Colonel C. R. Cecil, Lord Hugh (Oxford Univ.)
Beresford, Lord Charles Campbell, Captain Duncan F. (Ayr, N.) Cecil, Lord R. (Herts, Hitchin)
Clay, Captain H. H. Spender Hamersley, Alfred St. George Perkins, Walter F.
Clive, Captain Percy Archer Harris, Henry Percy Peto, Basil Edward
Collings, Rt. Hon. J. (Birmingham) Harrison-Broadley, H. B. Pole-Carew, Sir R.
Cooper, Richard Ashmole Helmsley, Viscount Pollock, Ernest Murray
Courthope, George Loyd Henderson, Major H. (Berks, Abingdon) Quilter, Sir William Eley C.
Craig, Captain James (Down, E.) Hewins, William Albert Samuel Randles, Sir John S.
Craig, Norman (Kent, Thanet) Hibbert, Sir Henry F. Rawlinson, John Frederick Peel
Craik, Sir Henry Hill-Wood, Samuel Rees, Sir J. D.
Crichton-Stuart, Lord Ninian Hoare, S. J. G. Roberts, S. (Sheffield, Ecclesall)
Cripps, Sir Charles Alfred Hohler, Gerald Fitzroy Rutherford, Watson (L'pool, W. Derby)
Croft, H. P. Hope, Harry (Bute) Sanders, Robert Arthur
Dalziel, Davison (Brixton) Hope, James Fitzalan (Sheffield) Sandys, G. J.
Eyres-Monsell, Bolton M. Horne, E. (Surrey, Guildford) Starkey, John Ralph
Faber, George Denison (Clapham) Horner, Andrew Long Staveley-Hill, Henry
Falle, Bertram Godfray Houston, Robert Paterson Steel-Maitland, A. D.
Fell, Arthur Hunt, Rowland Stewart, Gershom
Fisher, Rt. Hon. W. Hayes Hunter, Sir Charles Rodk. (Bath) Sykes, Alan John (Ches., Knutsford)
Fitzroy, Hon. Edward A. Ingleby, Holcombe Sykes, Mark (Hull, Central)
Flannery, Sir J. Fortescue Joynson-Hicks, William Talbot, Lord E.
Fletcher, John Samuel (Hampstead) Kebty-Fletcher, J. R. Terrell, G. (Wilts, N.W.)
Forster, Henry William Kerr-Smiley, Peter Kerr Thomson, W. Mitchell- (Down, North)
Gastrell, Major W. Houghton Kinloch-Cooke, Sir Clement Tobin, Alfred Aspinall
Gibbs, George Abraham Knight, Captain Eric Ayshford Valentia, Viscount
Gilmour, Captain John Lee, Arthur Hamilton Walker, Col. William Hall
Glazebrook, Captain Philip K. Locker-Lampson, G. (Salisbury) Weston, Colonel J. W.
Goldman, C. S. Locker-Lampson, O. (Ramsey) Wheler, Granville C. H.
Goldsmith, Frank Lockwood, Rt. Hon. Lt.-Col. A. R. White, Major G. D. (Lancs., Southport)
Gordon, Hon. John Edward (Brighton) Lonsdale, Sir John Brownlee Wills, Sir Gilbert
Goulding, Edward Alfred MacCaw, William J. MacGeagh Wolmer, Viscount
Grant, J. A. M'Calmont, Major Robert C. A. Wood, John (Stalybridge)
Gretton, John M'Neill, Ronald (Kent, St. Augustine's) Worthington-Evans, L.
Guinness, Hon. Rupert (Essex, S.E.) Middlemore, John Throgmorton Wright, Henry Fitzherbert
Guinness, Hon. W. E. (Bury S. Edmunds) Morrison-Bell, Capt. E. F. (Ashburton) Yate, Colonel C. E.
Gwynne, R. S. (Sussex, Eastbourne) Newdegate, F. A. Younger, Sir George
Haddock, George Bahr Nicholson, William G. (Petersfield)
Hall, D. B. (Isle of Wight) Paget, Almeric Hugh TELLERS FOR THE NOES.—Mr.
Hambro, Angus Valdemar Peel, Lieut.-Colonel R. F. Remnant and Mr. Stanier.
Mr. RUPERT GUINNESS

May I say I passed through the Lobby when there was no Teller at the door.

Bill reported without Amendment; to be read the third time to-morrow (Thursday).