21. Lieut.-Colonel Sir FREDERICK HALLasked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether, in view of the 16 number of countries which are in default in the payment of their contributions to the League of Nations in respect of the years 1920–30, inclusive, any steps are to be taken to deprive them of their voting power in fairness to those countries which bear their full proportion of the expenses of the League?
§ Mr. EDENThe answer is in the negative. This year, however, a committee was set up to consider the question of unpaid contributions previous to the 31st of December, 1930, and there are indications that, as a result of the greater importance now attached to prompt payment, the states concerned are taking steps to reduce their outstanding obligations.
Sir F. HALLIs the hon. Gentleman aware of the enormous amounts owing by many of these States, China in particular; and does he think it fair that they should have the same power given to them as if they had paid their contributions?
§ Mr. EDENI agree that the position has been most unsatisfactory, but it is now improving slightly, and for the moment we had better leave it there.
§ Mr. HANNONAre the representatives of these nations to continue to vote indefinitely at the meetings of the League when their contributions have not been paid?
§ Mr. EDENI am sure that the League is aware of it, as a special committee was set up to go into it.
25. Sir F. HALLasked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the Government will arrange for the issue of a White Paper explaining in simple terms the organisation of the League of Nations, the basis of membership, the manner in which important decisions are arrived at, and the extent to which nations belonging to the League are responsible for upholding such decisions in the event of one member or more refusing to be bound thereby?
Sir F. HALLIf I put down a question on this day week, will the hon. Gentleman be able to give a reply?