HC Deb 03 March 1887 vol 311 c1077
DR. TANNER (Cork Co., Mid)

asked the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, Whether it is a fact that the Board has declined to accept or recognize the reasons set forth in an unanimous Resolution of the Macroom Board of Guardians on the 29th January for changing the accounts of the union from the National Bank (Limited) to the Munster and Leinster Bank (Limited), and whether the Board are now prepared to sanction such a change; what were the reasons which actuated the Local Government Board in refusing to sanction the change of treasurership; whether it is a fact that the National Bank dishonoured the cheques presented by the union at first, when their overdraft did not exceed £1,493 1s. 5 d., and, secondly, when the overdraft was diminished to £1,077 6s. 7d.; whether such action on the part of the said bank has seriously embarrassed the union for several months, most of the officials and contractors not having been paid for several months; whether several of the contractors have threatened to discontinue supplies; whether the Munster and Leinster Bank offered the union accommodation to the extent of £2,000; and, whether the Local Government Board will see fit to sanction and promote the change of treasurer in the said union?

THE CHIEF SECRETARY (Sir MICHAEL HICKS-BEACH) (Bristol, W.)

I understand that most of the statements in this Question are substantially correct; but there seems to have been lately some change in the situation, for it does not appear that the Guardians are now making any representations as to financial difficulties, the treasurer having cashed all cheques presented.