HC Deb 26 March 1884 vol 286 cc842-3

Order for Second Reading read.

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Order for the Second Reading of this Bill be discharged, and that the Bill be withdrawn."—(Mr. Broad-hurst.)

MR. BERESFORD HOPE

asked whether the Resolution in pari materiâ, of which the hon. Member had given Notice, was consistent with the Standing Order, it being identical in substance with the Bill now before the House, and having been given previous to the Notice of withdrawal?

MR. SPEAKER

There was nothing informal in the Notice given by the hon. Gentleman the Member for Stoke. He now proposes to adopt a different mode of proceeding; but when the hon. Member gave Notice of his Motion, he intended, as I understood, to withdraw the Bill which now stands on the Order Book. I may remind the House that it is action, and not Notice, that is the material point, and the Motion of which Notice has been given could not come on for discussion so long as the Bill remained on the Orders. The hon. Member was quite in Order in taking the action which he did.

MR. HEALY

supposed that the right hon. Gentleman might, if he pleased, object to the adoption of the hon. Member's present Motion for discharging the Order for the Second Reading of the Bill?

MR. SPEAKER

Yes; in that case the Order would stand over till to-morrow, lint nobody has objected.

MR. HEALY

I object.

Motion, by leave, withdrawn.

Second Reading deferred till Tomorrow.