HC Deb 27 April 1849 vol 104 cc932-3
CAPTAIN BATESON

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the absence of the Master of the Mint (Mr. Shell), whether it was true that a certain young gentleman, who was not a solicitor in England, and who had only been sworn in within a few days in Ireland—he meant Mr. Reynolds, the son of the hon. Member for Dublin—was appointed to the responsible and lucrative situation of Solicitor to the Mint.

The CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER

No, he is not. At the same time it was true that he had been appointed a clerk in the office of the Solicitor to the Treasury and the Mint in Ireland, which offices had been amalgamated; but upon the question being put to the Solicitor for the Treasury and the Mint, whether it was desirable that this clerk should be a solicitor or not, the answer was that he should not.

CAPTAIN BATES ON

Is he not a solicitor?

The CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHE QUER

To the best of my belief, be is not.

Subject dropped.