| Heading: |
Packaging: Recycling |
| Question ID: |
1813627 |
| UIN: |
60718 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-06-17 |
| Asking Member ID: |
5239 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Sarah Gibson
|
| Asking Member handle: |
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
Sarah Gibson
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what recent assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of Extended Producer Responsibility schemes in incentivising circular product design. |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-06-24 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
1579 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Mary Creagh
|
| Answering Member handle: |
marycreagh_
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@marycreagh_
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes are internationally recognised as effective tools for promoting more sustainable product design. As part of the development of packaging EPR (pEPR) scheme, we have engaged with industry stakeholders to better... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
13 |
| Answering body name: |
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
| Tweeted: |
true |