| Heading: |
Law and Order: Artificial Intelligence |
| Question ID: |
1812709 |
| UIN: |
59917 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-06-13 |
| Asking Member ID: |
5111 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Martin Wrigley
|
| Asking Member handle: |
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
Martin Wrigley
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to ensure that decisions made using AI in law enforcement can be (a) explained, (b) reviewed, and (c) challenged. |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-06-23 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
1533 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Dame Diana Johnson
|
| Answering Member handle: |
DianaJohnsonMP
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@DianaJohnsonMP
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
It is for operationally independent Chief Constables to decide when and how they use AI-enabled or algorithmic tooling.However, the adoption of these technologies by law enforcement must be lawful, transparent, ethical and underpinned by robust data and g... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
1 |
| Answering body name: |
Home Office |
| Tweeted: |
true |