| Heading: |
Energy Company Obligation: Cost Effectiveness |
| Question ID: |
1803809 |
| UIN: |
53144 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-05-19 |
| Asking Member ID: |
4657 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Anneliese Dodds
|
| Asking Member handle: |
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
Anneliese Dodds
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment his Department has made of the value for money of the Energy Company Obligation scheme. |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-05-28 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
5099 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Miatta Fahnbulleh
|
| Answering Member handle: |
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
Miatta Fahnbulleh
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
The Energy Company Obligation (ECO) requires energy suppliers to fund energy efficiency and heating upgrades in eligible homes, with costs recovered through consumer bills. Since 2013, 4.2 million measures have been installed in 2.5 million homes. ECO4’s ... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
215 |
| Answering body name: |
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero |
| Tweeted: |
true |