| Heading: |
Gamekeepers |
| Question ID: |
1798158 |
| UIN: |
48815 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-04-28 |
| Asking Member ID: |
5336 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Helen Maguire
|
| Asking Member handle: |
helenemaguire
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
@helenemaguire
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of making employers of gamekeepers vicariously liable for their actions. |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-05-06 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
1579 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Mary Creagh
|
| Answering Member handle: |
marycreagh_
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@marycreagh_
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
The introduction of new regulation, such as vicarious liability, requires evidence that it will be effective. Vicarious liability occurs where one person can be held liable for the actions of another person. With regards to gamekeepers, this could mean a ... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
13 |
| Answering body name: |
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
| Tweeted: |
true |