| Heading: |
Sellafield: Plutonium |
| Question ID: |
1758733 |
| UIN: |
HL4420 |
| House: |
Lords |
| Date tabled: |
2025-01-27 |
| Asking Member ID: |
4988 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Lord Kempsell
|
| Asking Member handle: |
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
Lord Kempsell
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask His Majesty's Government why they have decided to immobilise and dispose of 140 tonnes of civil plutonium stored at Sellafield rather than repurposing the material for energy generation, selling it, or putting it to an alternative use, such as in m |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-02-10 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
2024 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
|
| Answering Member handle: |
lordphilofbrum
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@lordphilofbrum
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
Implementing a long-term solution for plutonium is essential to dealing with the UK’s nuclear legacy and leaving the environment safer for future generations. The material in its current form presents a significant and costly burden. DESNZ and NDA has con... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
215 |
| Answering body name: |
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero |
| Tweeted: |
true |