Heading: |
Work Capability Assessment |
Question ID: |
1757813 |
UIN: |
25632 |
House: |
Commons |
Date tabled: |
2025-01-22 |
Asking Member ID: |
178 |
Asking Member display name: |
John McDonnell
|
Asking Member handle: |
johnmcdonnellMP
|
Asking Member Twitter reference: |
@johnmcdonnellMP
|
Member interest: |
false |
Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the judgment in Clifford v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2025] EWHC 53 (Comm), for what reason she proceeded with the case. |
Is named day: |
false |
Date of holding answer: |
|
Date answered: |
2025-01-30 |
Date answer corrected: |
|
Is holding answer: |
false |
Is correcting answer: |
false |
Answering Member ID: |
163 |
Answering Member display name: |
Sir Stephen Timms
|
Answering Member handle: |
stephenctimms
|
Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@stephenctimms
|
Correcting Member ID: |
|
Correcting Member display name: |
|
Correcting Member handle: |
|
Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
Answer text: |
The Courts have found the previous government failed to explain their proposals adequately. We felt, on balance that the consultation that was under challenge had provided people with sufficient information and time to respond intelligently to the proposa... |
Original answer text: |
|
Comparable answer text: |
|
Answering body ID: |
29 |
Answering body name: |
Department for Work and Pensions |
Tweeted: |
true |