| Heading: |
Salisbury Convention |
| Question ID: |
1744913 |
| UIN: |
HL2904 |
| House: |
Lords |
| Date tabled: |
2024-11-26 |
| Asking Member ID: |
4567 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Baroness Finn
|
| Asking Member handle: |
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
Baroness Finn
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the constitutional implications of the reforms in the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill for (1) the continued validity of the Salisbury-Addison Convention, and (2) the conventions of t |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2024-12-09 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
4170 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Baroness Smith of Basildon
|
| Answering Member handle: |
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
Baroness Smith of Basildon
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
The conventions of the House are unaffected by the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill. The Bill fulfills a manifesto commitment to remove the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. As such, the Bill clearly engages the Salisb... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
53 |
| Answering body name: |
Cabinet Office |
| Tweeted: |
true |